Australian Motorcycle Superbike Test

**scorry** · 23rd June 2008, 16:00

yeah true, and they would have been tested by racers not average joes who cant push these new superbikes to anywhere near their potential, well i know i cant.
They are all amazing these days anyway

**Coyote** · 23rd June 2008, 16:10

Originally Posted by Goblin

Does this mean the RC8 is a POS??

It's their first go at a superbike. Next years model should have fewer kinks.

Originally Posted by Sanx

But who buys a superbike on its fuel consumption?

One of my excuses to upgrade

**bladerider97** · 23rd June 2008, 16:19

I think you would find that any of the bikes listed would be brilliant bike for road use, So it comes down to looks, price & what rocks your boat.

But being a fireblade owner it did bring a smile to my face, as they have been getting a bit of shit about being to sensible (by comparison) in the last few years.

**avgas** · 23rd June 2008, 16:37

Thats what happens when you put a jockey sized homo on a bike

**young1** · 23rd June 2008, 16:38

Is the Duc 1098S the fastest, isnt there an R model?

**Sanx** · 23rd June 2008, 18:35

Originally Posted by scorry

so what does the new CBR actually put out?

Originally Posted by scorry

Dont worry, i googled it, its 130.7kw.
if you wanna know more about the new cbr go to this site http://www.hondaitalia.com/moto/uff_...ure/index.html

This will be power at the crank, and therefore not comparable with the figures for the other bikes, as they were measured on the same dyno on the same day with the same temperature and atmospheric conditions.

The graph would tend to indicate the true figure was around the 127kW mark, but the graph's not all that easy to read accurately.

**raftn** · 23rd June 2008, 19:47

Originally Posted by NZsarge

Interesting is'nt it, when the KTM hit the road before being ridden amongst the others it was the best thing since sliced bread....
These tests while they are interesting and fun and all don't mean squat to the average rider that's actually buying the bikes, yes there maybe a hand full of people out there that tell the differences between these bike and be able to exploit it on the road but you would have to argue the road is not the place to be riding that hard.
As it's been for sometime now take tests like these with a grain of salt and enjoy your riding on whatever it maybe. In other words, buy your favorite bike, not what someone else thinks.

I agree with your comments whole heartdly, the average person would not even be able to tell the difference between most of the bikes, and even newer models. Just because a bike is 2 kgs lighter and has 3 more BHp it is so much better than the bike previous. At times i think these journalist have to justify there existance some how. All that said it was an interesting read. But find the bike you like and love and that is all that matters. Unless you are on a track there is a limit that you can ride a bike at on the road.

**bladerider97** · 23rd June 2008, 19:57

Originally Posted by young1

Is the Duc 1098S the fastest, isnt there an R model?

The R model is quicker and would more than likey clean up this test, but it is more of a race replica than an everyday sportsbike. And the price puts it out of most peoples league. Not sure of a NZ price but based on the overseas price it is almost 3 times more expensive than the 1098s which retails here for around $38k

**rocketman1** · 24th June 2008, 19:30

I read the results with no surprise.
What to buy???
There are a few major considerations that are as usual missed out in these reviews, and any one who has got their feet on the ground, and has owned a few bikes will tell you. It all comes down to price!!, reliability and resale values.
This is why the Suzuki and the Honda will be the top sellers again & again.
There are those that rightfully will choose European models, just because of status or desire, but will pay for the trip, I have no problem with that.
To me it all comes down to common sense, and experience, if you have been around long enough to have gained some.

**Mort** · 25th June 2008, 15:43

I rode the 2008 Blade (I have a 2007 blade). Its definately a step up . Its a fantastic bike.

If I had the cash I'd buy one.... no question. And if I had even more cash would I buy a Duke or a KTM...?

No. I'd still buy the Blade. Its that good.

**scorry** · 25th June 2008, 15:54

Originally Posted by Mort

I rode the 2008 Blade (I have a 2007 blade). Its definately a step up . Its a fantastic bike.

If I had the cash I'd buy one.... no question. And if I had even more cash would I buy a Duke or a KTM...?

No. I'd still buy the Blade. Its that good.

Good to hear from someone that has actually ridden one and loves it.
Might have to try one out myself.

MD · 26th June 2008, 22:53

I read tonight on another forum from an Aussie that the latest AMCN hit the shops with the 600 AusTest track & road results.
Should I spoil the fun for those that want to read it in the full magazine or not?
I'll check if it's in the shops tomorrow first.

Also the poster said that AMCN have pulled out of Masterbike-hence creating their own home version. Which is a bugger because I don't think any other magazine on sale here covers it?
EDIT- just re-read the article and they do say "say goodbye to masterbike..."

**humphrt** · 26th June 2008, 23:26

Oh post the 600 test too.
Sometimes i think that the litre beasts are just way too much for the road, i mean who out there can actually push a litre bike to the limit on the road, they is all fuckin mad

Well i guess thats the appeal...