nice, just your luck really, i couldnt find any when i was looking
![]()
nice, just your luck really, i couldnt find any when i was looking
![]()
we may just go where no ones been
I agree it's not that important. But just for reference, having done some beach racing earlier this year, I can tell you that my 200EXC, jetted overly fat/rich for safety at extended periods of 100% throttle, seemed to catch and pass all the 250 4T bikes near mesome more easily than others (except for one which I heard later had a big-bore kit). Unfortunately they'd catch & pass me through the turns
power isn't everything. And there were plenty of 250 4Ts off in the distance at the pointy end of the field.
Good choice!![]()
Cheers,
Colin
Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
That's pretty much my experience too.
I ride an 03 KTM 200 EXC that I moved to from a WR250F with YZ muffler and YZ exhaust cam timing. Also, I ride with quite a few riding mates who own/owned 250Fs (YZ, CRF, WR).
A crisply jetted 200 EXC is quite a lot faster than any 250F in a straight line roll-on through-the-gears power test, by 2-3 lengths or more when run out to about 80 - 100 km/h.
When it comes to general dirt riding this is all moot - as usual, the guy with the biggest balls wins. When straight horsepower matters though - for example, an old fat bastard suddenly encountering a short run up hillclimb in washy sand - a 200 EXC is a better bet than a 250F.
some good comments fella's .......keep em comin .![]()
might note a 200 2t beating a 250 4t for straight line power isn't surprising at all - it's what a 2t is best at, and it's firing twice as often would more thatn make up for the slightly smaller capacity
bring back the 500 2 strokes!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks