Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 87 of 87

Thread: Choice on 400cc motorbike?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    7th January 2007 - 16:03
    Bike
    NC30
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    890
    Quote Originally Posted by xerxesdaphat View Post
    That would be pretty cool to read

    I suppose if I were buying one, my problem would be, if they're anything like the GSXR250 (and one would assume so, given the dearth of them on the roads today), anecdotally at least, they don't seem to have stood up to the decades of squid abuse quite so well as the ZXR, VFR, CBR et al. It seems every other week there's somebody on here with one of the old small GSXR variety complaining about no compression, bent valves, bottom end gone missing etc.

    S'all intarweb stories of course, but there seems to be a hell of a lot of gorgeous VFRs blasting up and down Auckland roads having a fine time.
    This article is from the June 1994 edition of the Fast Bikes mag. I found I actually have two articles like this, this one, and one from September 1992 as well. But for now i can only be bothered scanning one =P

    If you are really interested I might find the time tomorrow to scan the other.

    This article starts by saying "The 250/400 division is teh most exciting and dynamic class in motor-cycling. It's also affordable. CBR400RR v GSXR400R v ZXR400 v FZR400 v RF400 v VFR400 v NSR400R v RGV250 v TZR250 (and one dead ZZR)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	496.2 KB 
ID:	102292   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (2).jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	500.7 KB 
ID:	102293   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (3).jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	545.2 KB 
ID:	102294   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (4).jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	591.5 KB 
ID:	102295  

  2. #77
    Join Date
    7th January 2007 - 16:03
    Bike
    NC30
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    890
    more of article....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (5).jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	538.2 KB 
ID:	102296   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (6).jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	571.0 KB 
ID:	102297   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (7).jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	688.0 KB 
ID:	102298   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (8).jpg 
Views:	24 
Size:	721.3 KB 
ID:	102299  

  3. #78
    Join Date
    7th January 2007 - 16:03
    Bike
    NC30
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    890
    even more of article...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (9).jpg 
Views:	27 
Size:	673.4 KB 
ID:	102300   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (10).jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	726.0 KB 
ID:	102301   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (11).jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	653.5 KB 
ID:	102302   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image (12).jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	572.9 KB 
ID:	102303  

  4. #79
    Join Date
    19th August 2007 - 00:07
    Bike
    Too many to count
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    5,949
    Quote Originally Posted by mark247 View Post
    Iv got an old bike mag from when all the 400cc 4cyl were new back in 1992 and it has a big review comparing them all. It said the that gsxr400 absolutely cleaned up in the corners.( if i remember correctly )

    If you would like to read it I could scan it up and post it on here.
    cheers for those scans - i love reading the reviews of older bikes from when they were new

    i wasn't talking corners as i haven't ridden one, my comment was due to shocking reliability/mechanical disasters

    Quote Originally Posted by bismarck View Post
    Why is that? Any reasons for that?
    A: my previous ownership of a gsxr250 taught me a few things, one of which was never to buy a gsxr (of that age) and to research bikes before buying. very expensive lesson learnt


    B: only ever seen one gsxr400 that was still running, and that was in a 250 chassis with untold amounts of problems/work.

    i'm not saying they had poor performance, just that they are not a bike worth buying if you want something reliable

  5. #80
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 13:01
    Bike
    Vespa 550
    Location
    dunedin
    Posts
    949
    cheers for the post up. what they write up and the figures showing speeds and cornering certainly dont really match up what so ever. Kinda goes to show that everyones different and what feels good may not be quick. Not that thats always a bad thing.

    most the gsxr400's are racing now i think. there are a number still at f3 meets. not bad reliability really but just no spares (wrecked) about.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    23rd February 2007 - 08:47
    Bike
    Blandit 1200, DRZ250 K, Beta xtrainer
    Location
    CHCH
    Posts
    2,130
    I have spent some big $$ on my gsxr400r, on regular maintainence and consumables. Reliability has not been an issue, and it handles real well for a 91 bike. ANY bike that has been thrashed and not maintained will be a liability.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    19th August 2007 - 00:07
    Bike
    Too many to count
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    5,949
    on my '89 gsxr250 with less than 30000km on the clock, one of the more amusing things to go wrong was the spline shearing off the front sprocket shaft when i went to take off from a set of lights. being something that should never happen, you'd think the drive shaft should be a bit harder than the sprocket wouldn't you? that and numerous other problems completely put me off the older gsxr models

    only issue i've had with the nc30 was a vacuum hose coming loose off the no.3 carby, likely due to the previous owners being the roughest fucking cunts to ever pick up a screwdriver... actually it may have been a chisel and hammer looking at some of their work

  8. #83
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 13:01
    Bike
    Vespa 550
    Location
    dunedin
    Posts
    949
    Quote Originally Posted by motorbyclist View Post
    on my '89 gsxr250 with less than 30000km on the clock, one of the more amusing things to go wrong was the spline shearing off the front sprocket shaft when i went to take off from a set of lights. being something that should never happen, you'd think the drive shaft should be a bit harder than the sprocket wouldn't you? that and numerous other problems completely put me off the older gsxr models

    only issue i've had with the nc30 was a vacuum hose coming loose off the no.3 carby, likely due to the previous owners being the roughest fucking cunts to ever pick up a screwdriver... actually it may have been a chisel and hammer looking at some of their work
    sounds like the person who did the work on my first nc30 race bike. Ahh a carby jets, there obviously removed using a hacksaw. But that being said my gentle nature is not usually complimented either.

    arent the hoses on the carbies all just breather hoses (not vacuum). Pretty certain i took them all outta my bikes. But mayb i missed something.

    The gsxr sounds like it was a fucked sprocket that would have been loose on the spline that fucked it more than likely as the safety factor incorportated on the spline shaft would be huge.

  9. #84
    Join Date
    19th August 2007 - 00:07
    Bike
    Too many to count
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    5,949
    Quote Originally Posted by lostinflyz View Post
    arent the hoses on the carbies all just breather hoses (not vacuum). Pretty certain i took them all outta my bikes. But mayb i missed something.
    vacuum for diaphragm on carbies? one of the rare times i let the mechanic (who raced an nc30 so knew what he was doing) have a crack at it as i wasn't game enough to attempt balancing 4 carbies, so only got the 2nd hand info

    Quote Originally Posted by lostinflyz View Post
    The gsxr sounds like it was a fucked sprocket that would have been loose on the spline that fucked it more than likely as the safety factor incorportated on the spline shaft would be huge.
    possible, you would think so... still no excuse for bent gear selector fork among other failures (put it in fith one day and found it was neutral. every few selections of 5th from then on would give a neutral gear with the sound of dogs on the synchro rattling away - mind you that was years ago before i looked at gearboxes so wasn't the one to diagnose it)

  10. #85
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 13:01
    Bike
    Vespa 550
    Location
    dunedin
    Posts
    949
    hmm dunno about the vacuum on the diaphrams. anyway.

    fair nuf on the gear selector fork. i think my nc21 has got a slight one. hooks alot of false neutrals up top of the box. just trying to match my alfa i guess.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    15th December 2007 - 18:43
    Bike
    05 S3
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    149

  12. #87
    Join Date
    19th August 2007 - 00:07
    Bike
    Too many to count
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    5,949
    how could they miss the vfr? it's a pretty popular bike over there...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •