Yes, any reasonable price
Possibly, cost mentioned is cheap
Possibly, cost mentioned is ok
Possibly, cost mentioned is too much
No
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
It's also bogus because although some allowances are made for engine noise being higher on bikes, it is essentially and ostensibly/supposedly a test of only how much noise comes out of the zorst. I have a feeling that even though my muffler will pass the test, my bike may fail, as the cake mixaahh!! makes so much noise itself. Lucky I don't have a dry clutch (although I do have some clutch noises, sundry engine parts rattles, oil pump rattle, etc.)
If/when my bike gets tested, I may have to either try to muffle the engine or pack the zorst with sound-deadening materials (like hamsters, 10-day old porridge, or politicians....)
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
Yeh I should have had a look at his settings.
I would think that he would have just been on "A" - slow cause it was a static test and SPL but I didn't look.
Talked about the system being moderated heavily at the moment because "they" wanted to see results. Lol wonder what that means![]()
A lot of audio test gear, particularly stuff that's not cutting-edge new shit and was originally designed for PA type purposes, defaults to 'C' mode and needs some twiddling by the operator to get it reporting results in 'A' mode.
If it's being driven by a numbnuts spanner jockey I wouldn't be surprised if it's being left in 'C' mode by mistake, which would explain your high reading.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Yep, for extra info, it has to be A weighted, meter set to fast response (there are several modes), three measurements must be taken to one decimal point, which are then averaged and conventionally rounded to a whole number.
Spikes during testing mean the test must be excluded, and another taken, and then you have the site considerations to also take into account along with positioning of equipment.
I wonder if I could beat your score with my baffle still in... I just need the equipment![]()
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
So too with Arrows.
When I discussed this "subjective" noise testing aspect with the WoF tester I use he told me that it's largely an attitude thing. Yours and his.
I took his comments to mean that if neither the noise nor the rider is obnoxious - no problem. Variation from that on either count? Problem!!!
Makes sense, they are human too. (Well most are :-)
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
Keep in mind fooling the WOF tester is only a partial solution. Once the exhaust is back to its normal loud self you may have it green stickered by the police for being too loud - then your so called WOF is as good as pigs weez in a yard glass.
Just a question...
Isn't dB exponential. Isn't 2dB at lower levels totally different to 2dB at higher levels...
So, it's all well saying it's 2dB out but it's make a huge difference when borderline high...
One thing that hasn't been discussed, not that i've read anyway, is that a bike will make more noise (pitch or sound???) the higher in the rev range it goes. If they are going testing for WOF pass, does each bike have to be under a certain DB level at a certain point in the rev range and under certain test conditions. I have open Akras, not the loudest, but they're pretty noisy. When the guy across the road from me starts his Harley it pales mine into insignificance. How can they justify how noisy your bike is?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks