
Originally Posted by
Phurrball
I can't see how the university could be held responsible -
*While it is a private car park, the area is publically accessable by foot (Freely and legitamately)
*There is no duty of care undertaken by university (we don't pay them for parking services, there is no explicit contract, no bailment - this kind of case has been litigated before wrt a private carpark which you pay to park in)
Because of the above, it is essentially the vehicle owner's responsibility to take steps to mitigate risk of loss - locks, insurance etc.
Un(i)safe patrols are something the university does anyway - not specifically aimed at preventing vehicle theft.
It is pretty raw that the camera is a dummy though...
IMHO the university would be negligent not to step up security now that this has happened. (by making their officers aware, increasing patrols etc)
This relies on them being properly informed. So long as we have informed them, we are entitled to know what additional security steps they are taking to mitigate this problem on their 'turf'
We could push for removable bollards to stop bikes leaving by walkways?
An idea: Because substantial locks are a pain to haul around, if the club was interested, I could line up some serious chain through my work and match that to identically keyed padlocks. Club members that wanted to could have a key and use any lock that was free? Would be first in, first served though
^^^I know this is only a deterrent - but it might help? Could be extended to areas other than CP36 too. Can discuss more at chiller.
Bookmarks