I'm drunk in charge of a keyboard....last time I did that I had contact with the Mods...I wonder how many infractions I'll get tonight? Do the mods do breath testing on KB?
I'm drunk in charge of a keyboard....last time I did that I had contact with the Mods...I wonder how many infractions I'll get tonight? Do the mods do breath testing on KB?
In space, no one can smell your fart.
Actually, that is pretty much a good description of it. Blood alcohol is tested (I think ) by gas chromatography. You fire up the machine,prepare the sample , mixing it with sme reagents n stuff, put the sample into a little gizmo, pop in the standards, used as reference, push the button and go have a quick smoke/coffee/wank (according to preference). Come back, the machine will have printed out the result. Tear it off , file and on to the next one.
I've never done forensic chromatography but I can't see it being any different to "normal" laboratory practice.
The reason for the delay is obvious. The operator can only sustain so much wanking per day, then he has to have a break.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Ya ding-bat, it's the same law for 'the public' too.
And in reference to dIng-bat #2 (SANX) the test MAY being done for the cops - but there is a sealed sample of the same blood wiating for the 'offender' to send of for an independant analysis in case he doubts the result the police present. (do you REALLY think the ESR do this JUST for police?)
No mystery here. The blood-test procedure is careful and takes time. The vials need to be correctly labelled, witnessed, packaged, couriered to the ESR lab. The lab gets around to processing when they have time - not exactly high priority critical work but it requires care. The sample is split into two, both labelled so they can be traced through the system. Eventually the blood is analysed for alcohol content.
Once the results are known, they have to be entered into a specific report, that needs to be indexed and traceable as part of the chain of evidence, and so on and on.....
Once the rozzers have the official report, the OIC needs to decide to prosecute and if he is on leave or off shift, or busy, that happens when prosecutions chase him up or he gets to it.
I'm surprised its as quick as three weeks - used to be about 6 weeks before charges were laid.
As for hospital samples, there are special rules. The hospital can't just take a blood sample and hand it over to the police just because they feel like it. Yes, there are occasions when samples are taken at the request of police - thats different again.
It is a complex and nit-picking thing to do.
No, it is nit picking. It has to be. Some lawyer will be looking over the process with a fine tooth comb.
I'm surprised that there have not been more challenges to the ESR , they never had a reputation for very reliable results.f'instance lawyers challenge the Breathlyser calibration, dunno if any of them have thought to challenge the GC calibration. Be a reasonable chance it was out of date, or not performed by a qualified technician or something
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
The process of testing blood, as carefully explained by Ixion, really is very quick. Maybe not ten seconds, but can be done inside a few minutes if one has access to a lab. Obviously booze buses and police stations don't have this equipment, so the sample needs to be sent off. But there's very little reason (other than incompetent bureaucracy and chronic underfunding) why any sample should sit in the lab's inbox for 2.5 weeks before they get around to it.
In other parts of the world it takes a couple of days. Max. In the UK, three days is about the longest anyone has to wait for the results of a blood alcohol test. That's why I find it so surprising it takes so long.
I suppose I am naive. I only lived in NZ for seven years and just how pathetic some of the infrastructure is never ceased to amaze me. Just like how stupefyingly stupid some of the Police officers are.
Sorry, ding-bat, but your carefully thought-out point has absolutely no relevance to what I was talking about. The Police's blood sample, after due testing, is used when deciding to charge the driver or not. Only if the driver is charged, would said driver choose to have the sample reserved for him analysed.
As I was talking about the time delay involved, what has the separation of the sample into two halves got anything to do with it? Or are you the sort of person who doesn't actually read and inwardly digest before spouting off completely unrelated shite?
Great, between my drunken ravings and the more lucid posts of some others we may have educated some who bother to read this thread!!![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Surely he would have been breath tested at the accident site assuming he was in a condition to do so? If thats good enough for the rest of joe public to get a DIC on then surely it's good enough to say that the cop was drunk at the time, while they wait for the blood test result to come back as confirmation.
The rest of joe public also get the chance to go for a blood sample.
And if injuries dictate it blood may be the only option.
(blood level is 99%+ likely to be higher than a breath test equivalent)
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
If you had read the article you should have picked up on the fact that seriously injured crash victims are taken to hospital, which tends to rule out the practicality of a road side breath screening test. Therefore the next best option is to take a blood sample at the hospital. This is the same for anyone in those circumstances regardless of their occupation.
He took a car - there is a question whether he was allowed to or not for starters.
He crashed it. He was injured and taken to hospital in an ambo. No breath test, as he is a patient receiving treatment. At hospital, bloods are taken. Same for anyone, cop or gang banger, MP or lawyer.
Blood results come back when the ESR do it. 2-3 weeks is normal. Only authorised analysts do these, so no defence there.
Take a breath people.You will get to hear all about it. It is a hot story for the local paper, who info share with the major papers.
And no, I don't know the result. I wouldn't tell anyways.It will be in the Harold for sure...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks