Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Never get stuck at traffic lights again !!!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    8th July 2005 - 02:55
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    790

    Never get stuck at traffic lights again !!!

    Are you sick of getting stuck at traffic lights ?

    Well here's the solution....



    Don't thank me - its a service I provide


  2. #2
    Join Date
    24th July 2007 - 14:25
    Bike
    CBR600RR 08 in NZ, SV650S in Sweden
    Location
    Wellington / Malmo Sweden
    Posts
    403
    Now i want something that will shoot these out in front of the bike so the lights change green when i get to them :P

    Dead HDDs are a cheap sourse of rare earth magnets

  3. #3
    Join Date
    29th May 2008 - 20:24
    Bike
    2014 Ducati Diavel
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    674
    Are the traffic light sensor wire loop setups that they have over in USA the same as what we have over here? Or would this not work for our traffic light sensors?
    www.albeephoto.blogspot.com

    DuuuuuCaaaaaaTiiiiiiiiiiii

  4. #4
    Join Date
    26th September 2005 - 21:14
    Bike
    05 450 EXC, 990 S
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,642
    We use the inductive loops over here as well. Ours are square looking loops rather than the long rectangular loops in the US so they loop a little different though.

    There is absolutely no need for a magnet however. You just have to know where to park over them so that you disrupt the magnet field. I rode a treadly (alloy framed rather than steel) around chch for 4 years (about 16,000kms) and I never once had issues with the lights not sensing me. Basically you need to stop over the center line of the two loops. This is where the bike will disrupt the magnetic field most. See the pic below.



    I've put up another post about this over here.

    Cheers R
    "The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    25th April 2006 - 15:56
    Bike
    Gerbil DNA 180
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    277
    The obvious downside of that is that you will also become visible to speed cameras triggered by the same inductive loop.
    "People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule

  6. #6
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    if you put big arse magnets strong enough to effect an underground cable, what will it do to your bikes computer etc, or your testicles?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    2nd February 2008 - 14:18
    Bike
    '08 VRSCDX Nightrod special
    Location
    Bogan County West Orks
    Posts
    185

    Ohhhhh Yeahhhhhhhh

    Does that mean it'll suck the lead rite outa my pencil babyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy.
    It's better to have ridden and crashed,than never to have ridden at all....R.I.P. Bruce Bennett (old fart-KB.) 1955-2005 posted by Bronwyn Bennett.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    6th November 2007 - 21:38
    Bike
    black 1
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    177
    i find it fun to scoot a head swerve into the turning lane then carry on straight, it stops the straight thru traffic behind you. because it thinks sombody wants to turn. ha har!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    29th October 2006 - 19:20
    Bike
    '69 K0, '71 Stinger, '73 Z1, '74 AC50
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    606
    So why on earth do they put the wire loop at the lights? Why not 200 meters down the road so you don't have to come to a complete stop. Obviously I'm not a road engineer but FGS it's not rocket science. Coming to a stop causes all road users to use more galsoline and it's just bloody inefficient. I work shifts and having to stop at an empty intersection for a red light at 04.30 in the morning drives me nuts.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    15th January 2008 - 20:53
    Bike
    1990 Suzuki GSX250F Across
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by toycollector10 View Post
    So why on earth do they put the wire loop at the lights? Why not 200 meters down the road so you don't have to come to a complete stop. Obviously I'm not a road engineer but FGS it's not rocket science. Coming to a stop causes all road users to use more galsoline and it's just bloody inefficient. I work shifts and having to stop at an empty intersection for a red light at 04.30 in the morning drives me nuts.
    Because then people coming out of a driveway 100m up the road won't signal the lights?

    If you really want to remove stopping at intersections, you need to computer-control cars to merge at intersections. That way they just modulate their speeds to fit through - no stopping in either direction needed (and it could handle pretty heavy traffic flows). But that only works so well in a theoretical world...
    Perfecting the art of insanity since 1982

  11. #11
    Join Date
    26th September 2005 - 21:14
    Bike
    05 450 EXC, 990 S
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,642
    Quote Originally Posted by toycollector10 View Post
    So why on earth do they put the wire loop at the lights? Why not 200 meters down the road so you don't have to come to a complete stop. Obviously I'm not a road engineer but FGS it's not rocket science. Coming to a stop causes all road users to use more galsoline and it's just bloody inefficient. I work shifts and having to stop at an empty intersection for a red light at 04.30 in the morning drives me nuts.
    The ideal is two loops one 50ish meters upstream from the limit lines and one at the limit lines. The upstream ones work as you say. The one at the limit line is used for figuring out when a queue has gone through. The reasons we don't have two sets of loops is cost and the limited benefit (sorry but the 8pm cars inconvenienced between midnight and 6am don't justify the costs).

    The reason we use the ones at the limit line is so that during peak periods we can "in theory" keep the queues to a minimum without giving excessive phase times to one set of approaches. Signals are constantly monitored by a central computer (think Turin computer in the original Italian job) and it figures out when queues have dissipated by recording the time interval between cars.

    Cheers R
    "The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    If you simply touch your side stand on the ground it works 95% of the time too.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    3rd June 2008 - 15:22
    Bike
    In between
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    293
    Quote Originally Posted by toycollector10 View Post
    So why on earth do they put the wire loop at the lights? Why not 200 meters down the road so you don't have to come to a complete stop. Obviously I'm not a road engineer but FGS it's not rocket science. Coming to a stop causes all road users to use more galsoline and it's just bloody inefficient. I work shifts and having to stop at an empty intersection for a red light at 04.30 in the morning drives me nuts.

    True that!
    www.icecard.co.nz

    I.C.E Card Letting people know!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •