RG250 (OR SIMILAR) rolling chassis's can take 500/650 British singles, or jap 500/600 (or thereabouts) singles. Certification is the biggest hurdle.
Its been done so often, plenty has been written about what problems there are...
RG250 (OR SIMILAR) rolling chassis's can take 500/650 British singles, or jap 500/600 (or thereabouts) singles. Certification is the biggest hurdle.
Its been done so often, plenty has been written about what problems there are...
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Hmm i have a CB360 plonked in a CB250 frame in the gargre somewhere... should dig it out sometime
wicked
can i hear you say "animal".Now this is what I would like, if your talkin large thumpers.
so can always fit modern shocks to an old frame though cant you? yeah im not really after a modernish frame(rg250) i really want it to be oldschool but still able to mix with the modern stuff in the corners.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonez
You haven't had a close look at a GB have ya? GB frame with an NX650 engine would be just lovely.
Nope, Coz if I (my ever so humble personal opinion of course) was going to build such a beast for the road I would make it out of an old Beezer or somthing that has cheap rego and can comply to the standards of the time.
No, that doesn't mean it has to cost heaps - it could use a rotten old barn frame or somthing as a base.
The idea of good rear suspension would be the stumbling point.
Each to thier own tho...
The vibration may be an issue depending on how well ballanced the single is, plus the ones with counter balance shafts and the like would be what to go for. Or you can also, or as well, isolate the motor like they did in the olden days with isolastic mounts.
Blast From The Past Axis of Oil
so im guessing that these mounts are rubber(or similar) that cushion the frame from the vibration? wouldnt this cause the frame to be less ridgid? which is not so hot on a speedy lil beast.The vibration may be an issue depending on how well ballanced the single is, plus the ones with counter balance shafts and the like would be what to go for. Or you can also, or as well, isolate the motor like they did in the olden days with isolastic mounts.
ok now this may seem completely ridiculoushow about a turbo'd single, i know the exhaust stroke once every four cycles isnt ideal. but lunacy is fun
![]()
Correct.
Just means you can't consider the engine to be a structural frame element. Rigidity in most planes is a good thing, you'd just have to design the frame to handle it alone. In theory that might mean more overall weight, however Mr Buell managed to produce one of the best handling, lightest bikes in it's class with an isolated motor.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Lucky Mr Buell has an R & D department, but im sure my millions from lotto last night will go towards it *gotta go check that ticket*.Mr Buell managed to produce one of the best handling, lightest bikes in it's class with an isolated motor.
The man who originated the isolastic mounts worked for Norton at the time.
I understand he left there when it became apparent that the future was bleak and he moved to the USA where he worked on the design of the "Rubber Glide". Which concept is spreading (or has spread) throughout the whole Harley range.
ok so it wouldnt quite be a cafe racer but what about this frame?
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Mo...-182667856.htm
trimmed down a little, with a big thumper in it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks