Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 76 to 80 of 80

Thread: performance of a 250 4 stroke

  1. #76
    Join Date
    25th January 2005 - 23:58
    Bike
    L0 RMZ250, Aprilia RS250/SuperMono673
    Location
    Unfortunately not Piha
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyadams
    you'd be throwing your bike away every corner if it only had the contact patch of a 10 speed. 10mm...
    Are you forgetting that a motorcycle tyre is circular?
    A 10 speed has a tyre not much wider than 10mm but it certainly does not have 10mm of contact. Just as a motorcycle does not use its 90 - 180mm of rubber, as my bike is sitting on its stand in the garage there is only 20mm of rubber touching the ground and thats not pushing it to its edge at full lean.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    29th December 2004 - 14:24
    Bike
    '94 YZF750R - RESTO TIME!
    Location
    ChCh
    Posts
    573
    the YZF has some good sized rubber, 180/55/17 on the rear 120/70/17 on the front, I went with 7cm just to be kind to the bikes, it's probably less in real life, but I wanted to give the bikes a fighting chance in the stats...
    ---Cut Here---
    '94 YZF750R - I love the smell of new tyre in the morning...
    EXUP Brotherhood

  3. #78
    Join Date
    28th September 2004 - 23:00
    Bike
    1992 VFR400R, 2007 SV650 Pro Twin
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,349
    I think the start of this argument is about road accleration of the 250 vs turbos, and having had experience with both, I think I can sum it up fairly unbiased, my evo IV vs my CBR250RR 0-80k/hr would be about the same, and yes the evo was modded although running standard boost. Around about 5.5 0-100 for both. After 100k/hr the bike is not in the picture though, so as the argument was initially about on the road acceleration I think it's fair to say that the 250 4stroke is definitely worth having... And my RGV would have comfortably beaten both. 400m and the speed gets too high for the 250 four stroke, so its not a fair comparison for road driving.

    And as far as cornering goes, my evo had Teins and could out corner the bike probably most of the time except for chicanes, cause the bike doesn't have to go as far.

  4. #79
    Join Date
    9th February 2005 - 12:14
    Bike
    1999 ZZR250
    Location
    Tawa, Wellington
    Posts
    192
    I drive a 1.3L rwd corolla wagon (ran a 17.917 at 119kms :spudbooge ) and could probly skin most big heavy turbos over piecocks! !
    spent sum time nd money on suspension, brakes and tyres!
    (plus a few lessons on how to drive it...... ...)

    i reckon i could beat myself on my ZZR250 now tho!... on a good day purely cos its got more pull outa corners and thers so much less weight to transfer through the chicanes.
    a sweepers a diff story but throwing it round i like the bike! !

    however the supersticky rubber means my rolla will (safely) do similar times in the wet with gravel etc on th road...... while staying warm and dry........crankin th beats.......
    pity its in the shop for a while..............

    hang on i've got a bike outside and its sunny.............
    The world stands aside to let anyone pass who knows where he is going....

  5. #80
    Join Date
    7th September 2004 - 10:00
    Bike
    A Krappisaki Tractor
    Location
    South
    Posts
    941
    ha ha..

    I drive a carina wagon, all of 2.0 of them there litres. I reckon it could top your corolla wagon any day. I'd be on for a 20s 1/4 which must be better coz the numbers are bigger
    The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
    It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •