Well Lou...Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
Some people (not me of course) might just consider it was this piece of fat thrown on the fire that sparked it all off....
Paul N
Well Lou...Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
Some people (not me of course) might just consider it was this piece of fat thrown on the fire that sparked it all off....
Paul N
No, for one short session I thought I would return in kind only to those who had insulted me. Possibly that is all who had posted counter arguments, because virtually all of those have been of the "I believe this, you are xxxx" kind. There has not been one piece of authenticated counter fact that I can recall.Originally Posted by spudchucka
And after going all round in circles on the arrested woman red-herring, we finish up that she was probably arrested illegitimately anyway which accounts for why she was then released with no charge.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
It is opinion. If you have verifiable evidence, produce it.Originally Posted by marty
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Dang, just as I was getting my daily postings up a bit too, you do have some uses Alan.
Anyone who posted anything that questioned your "beliefs", as that is all they are, graphs or otherwise, was either A) Ignored or B) Abused.
Need an example?
What about the question as to where all the money was coming from for new roads, more research, longer court sittings? If you reread the postings all those questions and more were asked and ignored, why?
ok, I know I'm not marty, but I suppose you'd like a graph?????Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
why don't you get out and volunteer to scrape people off the road??? too busy crunching numbers???
Might just be a statistic to you, buddy, but it's someones fucking life that becomes a red mess. go volunteer, you'll see for yourself....
Ther'e's no abuse in it though.Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
Nor in what I said, so just how sensitive is this Alan chap?Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
For what it's worth, most of my opinions agree with Alan's and I have scraped people off the roads. There are a lot of older cops that agree with our arguments too.Originally Posted by Blakamin
Being at the coal face doesn't necessarily mean you know how to find new coal mines.
He wasn't aware of what he was getting into. Held his own quite well, I thought.Originally Posted by Mongoose
I don't believe he could have done a worse job at attempting to get people on side. His facts were weak, and he appeared uncomfortable and defensive when they were called into question, and this was before he started to get personal.Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
He might make a good home loan agent though.
This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:
Thavalayolee
You Frog Fucker
As a crusader, that he purports to be, I doubt "He wasn't aware of what he was getting into." Or he has a lot to learn, but how can he when he is so educated he should know.Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
The man wants to learn the art of LISTENING and ANSWERING if he wants to push a barrow to any effect
That's why it's important to do things that work and are proven to do so.Originally Posted by Blakamin
Swearing and performing doesn't make you right or impress me in the slightest.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
Traffic policing now costs around $350M per annum. Fines and current court costs re speeding are probably another $150M. Better roads reduce casualties (save Health and ACC costs) as well as contributing to future wealth in many ways and reducing future welfare costs.Originally Posted by Mongoose
There is plenty of money now being wasted that could be redirected.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
And those figures are varifiable and accurate (not that i would think you would post other wise)Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Can see one flaw already, what you were proposing would NOT do away with Traffic Policing. By how much you dont indicate.
"Fines and current court costs re speeding are probably another $150M." is obviously at best a gestimate, and what you propose would INCREASE court costs as EVERY ticket would be contested, no saving made at all
I think you need to eat your own words. you are one of the worst on here for swearing and name calling.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
![]()
must ride everyday
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks