I think that's only an option on the US market model...Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
I think that's only an option on the US market model...Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Nope, all ours are after marketOriginally Posted by Hitcher
Sever
Now and forever
you're just another lost soul about to be mine again
see her, you'll never free her
you must surrender it all
And give life to me again
Disturbed - Inside the Fire
They were just as dumb before. Its just that its a new kind of dumb now!Originally Posted by Hitcher
My "ad hominem BS" which happens to parralel that of other in the same line of work down here is that the serious crashes have declined steadily over the last 3-4 years (about the same time the 'de facto' speed limit went from 120+ down to 110 -.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
O.K., I'll put my neck on the block to a certain extent by admitting I have no 'figures' to substantiate the above but it is true.
Mind you our population growth is lagging behind that of the top of the North Island so our vehicle & population has not increased as much this may be reflected in the number of crashes up the 'other end'.
How do you measure a life saved in dollars? And how do you count/measure the hypothetical lives saved?
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Why does everything these days have to be expressed in dollars and cents :spudwhat:Originally Posted by scumdog
"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
You are truly amazing, Spud. I can't be bothered with your drivel any longer. But one last fact for you. There is indeed still a Ministry of Transport in Wellington. And it has just taken back responsibility for Transport Safety policy from LTSA which has been disbanded.Originally Posted by spudchucka
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
The data for Southern police district is here (see chart at the bottom of the page)Originally Posted by scumdog
http://www.fastandsafe.org/site.aspx...rcement/charts
and in the spreadsheet accessible from here:
http://www.fastandsafe.org/site.aspx...forcement/data
In fact, your district has had a large increase in injuries, the biggest in NZ.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
Yup, REPORTED injuries as per policy now, earlier they were virtually only reported if a person was admitted to hospital.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
And I stand by the statement and emphasise the word in it that you appear to have overlooked: SERIOUS.
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
just had a squiz at your links....Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
I think you need to get out more.......
My opinion stands. If any civilian had done what those police did he would be serving a jail term. Those police carried out an "arrest" in order to put psychological pressure on a pregnant teenage mother giving them the opportunity to remove her baby to increase that pressure.Originally Posted by Indo
That you police call her a scumbag does not give you any rights to inflict punishments or sanctions on her. That is the function of the courts not the police. And by your account it was an abuse of process and a perversion of the intent of the law.
I have no agenda re the police, other than to try to ensure New Zealand does not become a police state in my lifetime, to ensure my tax dollars are not wasted or misused by them, and to correct any traffic-related misinformation campaigns by them.
Finally, it appears the only significant omission by the "crappy Tabloid" was the police belief that the individual was a burglar (which was anyway there to be inferred between the lines) and the only error was a misinterpretation of what the lawyer said about obstruction which also was not something I took at face value. So all your ranting about research not done is bollocks. You've added nothing significant to the story and not changed my opinion at all except to confirm that whenever additional powers are given to police they will almost certainly be abused sooner or later.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
Well, I'm sorry I can't give you individual police district data on this one, but NZ-wide the ACC claim data confirms that the NZ-wide increase in injuries from 2001 is real and not just police reporting changes.Originally Posted by scumdog
I guess the other point to note is that in the Southern district, fatalities have trended up against the previous trend. So it would be very surprising if serious injuries had not too.
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
Please don't try and blow hot air up my arse Alan, it won't change my mind about you.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Ahhh, right, I get it now, "amazing" huh, thats you being facetious, right?Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Oh, you mean "Ikiiki Whenua Aotearoa", why didn't you say so instead or implying our old snake friends in black and white were still lurking about somewhere?Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Refer to post 128 if you don't like they way I'm replying to your posts. The last sentence is a clue.
And you haven't answered my question(s) in post 161 yet. How do you expect me to compare the roading infrastructures of New Zealand and Scandanavia (Denmark/Norway/Sweden) without that information?
Or do I have to apply for it under the official informations act?
Fuck off - not in our neck of the woods, mate.Originally Posted by Moko
Whilst I can see where Spud is coming from and sympathise with what Alan is trying to get across,Im afraid when I read this thread now, all I can think of, is the theme song for "the Itchy and Scratchy Show" !!
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
So who gets to define if it is safe or not....Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Is not the traffic speed law set, so that vehicles who pass a warrant of fitness can safely travel according to the road code, without causing harm to ourselves or others. If we break the road rules regardless of the ectenuating circumstances then we should accept responsibility and suck up the fine or the deaths that we cause,
The road law (in my opinion) is set to define a safe environment for everyone no matter if your Peter Brock, Possum Bourne or Joe Bloggs down the road.....driving a crap bike an R1, a top of the line cage or a VW beetle....it has to be set with all the variables in mind...
The Possum Borne incident is a perfect example....You have two drivers who are very experienced rally drivers doing what they think is safe and they crash..simply because one did not follow the laws of the land...If he had done what was safe following the legal rode code Possum would potentially still be around...and so would a whole lot of people who die on our rode..
We have the rights to travel at the limits set by the rode code and the responsibility to do so...if we go outside those limits we deserve what we get....
Yup, you're right. Time to let the cops tag team go play somewhere else and get out more like the man said.Originally Posted by SPman
The only unfinished business I've noticed is I wouldn't mind knowing exactly when the cops changed their reporting criteria for injuries and how it was rolled out. The Southern district numbers do look abnormal compared with everywhere else. Let me know if anyone finds out.
Cheers
Alan Wilkinson (www.fastandsafe.org)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks