But you DO NOT know what works, its all an experiment to you, its all theory not proof.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Are you in any way suggesting that a lower speed does not minimise the risk of unjury/death?
But you DO NOT know what works, its all an experiment to you, its all theory not proof.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Are you in any way suggesting that a lower speed does not minimise the risk of unjury/death?
Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Sounds like another form of tax to me, just the place it is going is different. I mean that private business is going to want to pay for what the build PLUS make a profit PLUS have enough to mantian their asset. Who will police these private roads, private police?
Compulsory insurance has done a great job of reducing the cost of insuring in places like the UK has it?
Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Actually i think you have reached a conclusion and then looked for facts to back them up. The american study as per my last post you quoted used data for 3 years 1996 - 1999 and only used very small sections of road and concluded that speed is in fact a significant issue still in road safety.
The conclusion indicated in that study (not the persons unpublished (read non-peer reviewed) dissertation) was that there was little to be gained from increasing the speed limit i.e. the imfamous cost/benefit ratio. The study also indicated that the impact in the rural areas was that there would be a higher road toll which I would assume reflects NZ roads much better than comparing the US Highways or the German Autobahns.
Personally i think to achieve your 4 lane highway we should increase the taxes of companies and those people who are in the top tax bracket... (PT)![]()
Alan is after all a statisticianOriginally Posted by hobdar
![]()
From personal experience, and I am sure that most active motorcyclists would agree, most drivers do NOT almost always get it right. Collect data from motorcyclists and you would have a very bleak picture about the ability of most drivers to negotiate a straight piece of two lane highway.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Collecting the data could be problematic though. If I was required to log every example of a driver not complying with the road rules, or making a decision that put someone else at risk, it would take me two to three hours to ride the 22km to or from work. It is more by luck and ingrained habit that most drivers get it something like right.
The most annoying thing is that I've just made a subjective judgement of the driving standards in the Wellington/Wairarapa region, and I'm about to be informed that my opinion is unwanted.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
What do you suggest they do to punish all the miscreants? Take their birthdays away from them?Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
..?Originally Posted by spudchucka
sacrific their first born to judist preists.
I can't see how you arrive at that. In terms of traffic crashes the risks and and outcome possibilities only get worse as speed increases. Reaction times, stopping distances, the ability to effectively scan for hazards, the negative effectcs of a sudden reduction in forward momentum, physics, human falability etc etc etc all say increased speed means increased risk.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
There is no reason to increase the speed limit simply because some people find it boring. Some road users find 110 terrifying but I suppose you would ban these otherwise legitimate road users from sharing your playground.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
You are having a hard time proving your point as far as I can see.Originally Posted by Alan Wilkinson
Never liked Judas Priest. I was always more of a Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Fleetwood Mac (the original fleetwood, not the wussy girl stuff they did with Stevie Nicks) kinda guy.Originally Posted by John
what is it with you and sacrificing first borns????Originally Posted by John
RED RED REDI WANTREDThe count is at 1064 points
'Scuse me. Do you f**k as well as you dance?
I have not had one yet, so the options still on the table.Originally Posted by Slipstream
Are you a middle child John?Originally Posted by John
Sever
Now and forever
you're just another lost soul about to be mine again
see her, you'll never free her
you must surrender it all
And give life to me again
Disturbed - Inside the Fire
But on topic, I totally agree with you spud, and only can register my vote for you because your saying everything I beleave so heres a cold one
actually yes...lol only had a step brother and sister.Originally Posted by alucard_draken
![]()
I sometimes find it confusing why some roads are the speed they are. Who decides them? I mean, how do they work it out?Originally Posted by spudchucka
RED RED REDI WANTREDThe count is at 1064 points
'Scuse me. Do you f**k as well as you dance?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks