Someone wanna explain what bots09 is?
no; you own a back seat if i remember correctly
might've been the boot
I shall take the wheels if you guys aren't careful, then no ones going anywhere
Alright alright fine... I'll take the front seat.
The irony. Arguing about seats in a cage going to a motorcycle meeting.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
It sounds like I could write a law journal article on ownership of the chattel commonly referred to (perhaps incorrectly?) as 'Jafa's Car'. Paintball at 50 paces? I'll watch
I'd be up for camping, but I'm not sure that the fairer half would be so keen to be away from the comforts of home (and I'd be goind down after work = suck)
Tenants in common, I reckon. In the Middle Ages there used to be tenures where the peasants of the manor jointly owned the plough and the cart (and the cart horse I guess). And in some cases the mill, though that was more commonly owned by the lord of the manor, or the bishop. I would imagine that such tenure would still be lawful today. In which case they all jontly own the same thing, indivisibly.
Unlike bikers, who of course would each ride their own bike.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Ah Phurrball, the car is not in dispute. At least, everything bar the front passenger seat, which looks to be fiercely contested.
I suggest a Ring of Death - a proud and noble tradition with its roots firmly set in history, being the ultimate in argument settling since, oh, Battlefield 1942 as I recall.
And Ixion - we fail to see the point of taking the bikes on a long, straight, flat road. As none of us ride cruisers, we don't really see the attraction, nor the sense in squaring off tyres for no purpose.
Plus of course cars can carry more beer.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks