Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35

Thread: Rode code vs actual riding

  1. #16
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    I can tell you one law that is almost universally disobeyed: 30km/h past a school bus that has stopped to let passengers on or off, no mater which side of the road you are on relative to the bus. I can't remember the last time I saw anyone obey this (apart from myself).

    And the other day at work, our departmental boss was complaining because he got ticketed for doing a rolling stop at a stop sign. And my boss chimed in and said he never came to a complete stop at the stop sign on his street unless there was some traffic coming the other way. I was most unsympathetic. I have a particular beef about stop signs because I bought my first bike from a lady who had years of grief after some old bat drove though an intersection with a stop sign and into her. Apparently, she almost never bothered stopping. The result in this case was a leg badly broken in 6 places, weeks in traction, followed by weeks in plaster up to her chest, then more weeks in a full leg one, followed by calipers, followed by walking with a cane for a very long time.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  2. #17
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    But that was nothing to do with a sign. And everything to do with inattention. I'm not saying that one shouldn't stop at such a sign, BUT that if one was actually looking, then no crash would take place.
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    13th September 2005 - 18:20
    Bike
    Crashed it.
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,043
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    ...he got ticketed for doing a rolling stop at a stop sign.
    WTF is a 'rolling stop'? It's either a stop or it's not!
    If it wasn't for a concise set of rules, we might have to resort to common sense!

  4. #19
    Join Date
    3rd March 2004 - 22:43
    Bike
    Guzzi
    Location
    In Paradise
    Posts
    2,490
    Quote Originally Posted by MsKABC View Post
    Nope, it's Weet-bix for illiterates.
    And beta-bix for nerds.

    Skyryder
    Free Scott Watson.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    16th March 2007 - 07:15
    Bike
    2007 ZX6R
    Location
    Matauri Bay
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Preload View Post
    Example.
    I like the question where they ask why you wear a full face helmet and one of the options is

    "so your mates won't recognise you when you get pulled over by the cops" - or words to that effect.

    I think from memory the answer was to provide better protection in a crash but I really really wanted to tick the above for a laugh

  6. #21
    Join Date
    3rd January 2007 - 22:23
    Bike
    A chubby lollipop
    Location
    I'm over here!
    Posts
    2,539
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyryder View Post
    And beta-bix for nerds.

    Skyryder
    And Weta-bix for entomologists.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    5th April 2006 - 09:52
    Bike
    2001 GSX1200
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Max Preload View Post
    WTF is a 'rolling stop'? It's either a stop or it's not!
    When you come to a stop, but the earth is still moving underneath you. Requires quite a high relative speed, especially closer to the equator.

    Richard

  8. #23
    Join Date
    29th December 2007 - 18:54
    Bike
    GN250!!!!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    855
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxB View Post
    It is like a game. Until you get your full everything the Road Code says is true. It shows a perfect world where everything is laid out in neat little diagrams. And everybody obeys the rules. Do what you have to do to pass.

    Riding on the streets is about survival, you do what you have to to survive. Most drivers never read it again after they get their licence and they don't give a stuff about your well being.

    Luckily I have spent most of my life driving with all those bloody lunatics in the UK so drive defensively and as if every other person on the road is useless!! I guess at the end of the day I will learn more about staying alive on a bike from watching and talking to other well seasoned bikers.
    We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl, year after year,
    Running over the same old ground.
    What have you found? The same old fears.
    Wish you were here. QWQ

  9. #24
    Join Date
    2nd August 2008 - 08:57
    Bike
    '23 CRF 1100
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    One of the questions when I applied for my W.O.F. certification was:

    If a tyre shows a reading of 1.6mm tread depth would you......

    (a) fail it

    (b) pass it

    (c) pass it and tell the owner that it may not pass it's next WOF.

    I chose C and got it wrong.

    Apparently I don't have the right to advise the owner that it might not pass next time.

    Go figure.
    I would disagree with all 3 answers, prefering instead:
    (d) Pass it and tell the owner that they should check it and replace it when it gets to 0.5mm. Especially for a 12 month WoF.

    It just seems a sensible thing to point out to the car owner that their tyre is getting close to the legal minimum, then it is up to the car owner what they do with that information.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable
    "If the cops didn't see it, I didn't do it!"
    - George Carlin (RIP)

  10. #25
    Join Date
    7th February 2009 - 07:52
    Bike
    Euro trash
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    One of the questions when I applied for my W.O.F. certification was:

    If a tyre shows a reading of 1.6mm tread depth would you......

    (a) fail it

    (b) pass it

    (c) pass it and tell the owner that it may not pass it's next WOF.

    I chose C and got it wrong.

    Apparently I don't have the right to advise the owner that it might not pass next time.

    Go figure.

    So why do they have "comments" at the bottem?
    I have my WoF cert, I had the same loaded question...

  11. #26
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkH View Post
    I would disagree with all 3 answers, prefering instead:
    (d) Pass it and tell the owner that they should check it and replace it when it gets to 0.5mm. Especially for a 12 month WoF.
    Well that would definately score you a fail.

    The minimum depth is 1.5 mm.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    21st December 2005 - 23:41
    Bike
    HONDA EXPRESS
    Location
    forest brightly feathered
    Posts
    6,457
    Quote Originally Posted by vifferman View Post
    I can tell you one law that is almost universally disobeyed: 30km/h past a school bus that has stopped to let passengers on or off, no mater which side of the road you are on relative to the bus. I can't remember the last time I saw anyone obey this (apart from myself).
    I've never seen anyone obey that law either (apart from myself and my folks). Other motorists have even overtaken me when i've obeyed this law.

    www.PhotoRecall.co.nz

  13. #28
    Join Date
    2nd August 2008 - 08:57
    Bike
    '23 CRF 1100
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Well that would definately score you a fail.

    The minimum depth is 1.5 mm.
    Meh - I just replace them when there is not much tread left, I have never in my life actually measured it.

    But my point remains - it just makes sense to advise the owner of the car that legally they have to replace the tyre once it is below the legal minimum tread depth and they shouldn't wait 'til the next warrant to worry about it, especially if it is a 12 month WoF.

    I can't see how they can say that you don't have the right to give advice to the owner of the car, why would they say that? Are they trying to preserve the polices ability to find something to ticket the car for in a couple of months? Is there a ticketing quota for cars being in an unwarrantable condition?
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable
    "If the cops didn't see it, I didn't do it!"
    - George Carlin (RIP)

  14. #29
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkH View Post
    Is there a ticketing quota for cars being in an unwarrantable condition?
    Not as such but............

    The powers that be in W.O.F. HQ take a close look at any certifying agency that fails less than 10% of their vehicle checks entered online.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    21st October 2005 - 20:58
    Bike
    2014 Honda NC750X
    Location
    West Auckland
    Posts
    3,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    One of the questions when I applied for my W.O.F. certification was:

    If a tyre shows a reading of 1.6mm tread depth would you......

    (a) fail it

    (b) pass it

    (c) pass it and tell the owner that it may not pass it's next WOF.

    I chose C and got it wrong.

    Apparently I don't have the right to advise the owner that it might not pass next time.

    Go figure.
    Crikey, I get advised my tyres on my bike won't pass the next one all the time.
    I just smile, say thank you and add, "Nor will my front pads", and ride off.

    Amazed that you have no right to offer advise as a safety inspector.... Amazed.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •