Ummm... actually it improves fuel quality significantly. My dad has all the data, but of course he cant release any of that because of corporate sensitivity etc, but yeah... Techron definitely makes you're engine run considerably better.
Oh well, if your Dad says so, then it simply must be true... if even if you can't provide even the slimmest of facts![]()
I understand that a barrel of oil is about 92 litres (give or take) and costs around NZ$120 ish depending upon the day of the week time of the month.
Can anyone tell me how many litres of 95 grade fuel can be produced from a litre from such a barrel?
I am just curious to know if the ratio is more or less than 50/50.
In a sense, that's true.
The additives they add to petrol to "improve it" are by and large by-products of the refining process. Petrol is a mixture of low boiling point volatiles such as heptanes, and the additives they put in to "clean the fuel system" and increase the octane rating are generally things such as toluene and xylene that are good at dissolving the tar deposits and varnish that can accumulate inside your engine. Conveniently for the fuel companies, many of these substances are things that have a limited market compared to petrol (making their price fairly low on the market), so they need to find an alternative use for them. Xylene and toluene, f'rinstance, are used as paintbrush cleaner, and also used as part of paint and plastics manufacture.
You could say in a way that they're using petrol as a convenient outlet for disposing of some of their industrial waste. In doing so, it means they don't have to spend as much money refining the petrol in the first place, which ironically means that the petrol itself is responsible for the very deposits their additives are put in to remove. Kind of a circular argument...
Nett result is an increase in their profits, and in some ways a fuel that's more toxic and less clean than the nasty old leaded perol they used to produce.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
No, but I can tell you that basically all they do to make 95 is take 91 and add extra crap to it. I seriously doubt it costs any more to make.
Edit: Scrub that - I googled it (it was SO hard, and took all of 5 seconds). One 42 gallon barrel makes 19.5 gallons of gas. If you click my link, note that US octane ratings are different: their 87 is the same as our 91(RON).
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
don't you mean to say our "91" is actually closer to 87(RON) (by the time we get it from the pump)?
right, so it doesn't actually clean my engine so much as slow the rate at which it is ruined by their fuel?...consisting of a family of compounds known as polyether amines.[1] Techron reduces accumulation of deposits in fuel injectors and on intake valves, and minimizes build-up of deposits in the combustion chamber.[2] With the introduction of Techron, Chevron gasolines became designated as meeting TOP TIER standards for fuel cleanliness.
lol
Depends on the refinery. Some are optomised to produce light end stuff, (petrol) and some aim for mid-range products like Deisel and heavy fuel oil.
I believe Marsden Pt was originally designed to maximise Deisel output, that being driven by market prices at the time. Needless to say the market changed significantly once production started.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Also I believe marsden point is designed to be best with cheap (shitty) high sulphur oil as a feedstock, so the really nice oil they are pulling out of the ground around taranaki gets sold overseas at a premium price.
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
Ran on some 97.5 that was so called 50/50 bio fuel petrol mixture and seemed to gain some milage from that fill up - recall i seemed to get 30k's further on that tank than usual
Some place in Masterton- forget the brand
Or was it a tailwind that day?![]()
Just ride.
I always use BP Ultimate...higher octane, better performance, more km's, etc. 91 is utter crap!
Two most important factors are the compression of the motor, and now, bio fuel compatibility. Higher compression motors needed the higher octane rating (ie, sportsbikes need 95+, while say, a hornet 900 will be fine on 91).
Euro bikes tend to need higher octanes (even 97.5+) as their fuel is a higher quality, so the bikes are designed with it more in mind...
With bio-fuel, some bike's fuel lines are not designed with it in mind, and can ruin the lines etc, so don't use it unless you know the bike is compatible with it.
Other than that, plenty of threads have been done. I find my bikes normally have a preference of sorts, getting better mileage on some brands than others...
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks