Throttle control shouldn't ever come into the equation - the throttle goes to the stop,and then rider control takes over.
Single
V-Twin
Parallel Twin
Triple
In Line Four
V-Four
5-6 ?
Other
Throttle control shouldn't ever come into the equation - the throttle goes to the stop,and then rider control takes over.
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
No, i'm talking about how a bike hooks up and puts the power to the ground.
I remember F3 guys when GSX-R400's were popular taking out one plug and racing on 3 cylinders when it was pissing down at Levels once. They were able to go faster in the wet like that because they ended up with better traction instead of the silky smooth power delivery spinning up.
And sometimes it is out of the scope of the rider..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LShY-dIns8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9zNUPDmnz4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=092x6rr5lPw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtofbxmlv8Y
Interested in a mild trundle Sunday?
Yup, they make what sells. Pity about the idiots who believe what they see ont' telly saturday arvo might make a good road bike. Or that there's any functional relationship between that and what they see on the showroom floor.
Meh. I tried suggesting sealed fuel cells to some of the racing dudes, that that should be the only restriction. Weren't impressed, phrases like chequebook engineering abounded. Still, reckon a completely open class would be an eye opener for the conservatists.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Interesting that V Twins still more popular despite the R1's, Gixxers etc...
DESPITE? Because of maybe?
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
That Norton wankel engined bike does take some getting used to, but what a sound. V Twins still rule.
Every day above ground is a good day!:
Now I'm a solid Inline four type of guy, but theres no doubting the truly rude sound a V twin give off.....
I ask for nothing but to ride where ever the road calls
The greatest pleasure of my recent life has been speed on the road. . . . I lose detail at even moderate speed but gain comprehension. . . . I could write for hours on the lustfulness of moving swiftly.
--T.E. Lawrence (of Arabia)
Then there is this
Bit tempermental in the tuning department apparently.
They were working on a 50cc 4 stroke triple before pulling out.
your v-twin boys will spend their lives defending their purchase decision of Italian exotica but then they have to given the prices (and the absurdity of banging their heads against the rest of the world's wall performance-wise)
your 4 cylinder boys have learnt nothing since 1969 when the Honda CB750 took on the world and lost in all terms except reliability (handling and power of the BSA Rocket 3 was heaps better)
and then there was the 4 cyclinder Z1 - widow-maker didn't they call it ? the first in a long line of jap fours that went better in straight lines
so you have the sixes (CBX and Z1300) which my mechanics professor described as "nonsense" (he wasn't quite right but they were a tad impractical so he wasn't totally off the mark) or triples - doh
Last edited by red675; 11th April 2009 at 23:24. Reason: spelling
I prefer a twin because of the early delivery of useable torque. I bought my Ducati because it is cheaper to buy and maintain than a Hyosung 650. Japanese bikes were too exotic for me with lots of valves, injection, computer gadgets and stuff that would be great on the race track but impractical for day to day riding.
In my opinion about 90% of riders today have far more bike than they can handle. We aren't all Valentino Rossi or Casey Stoner so why do we have to have the latest greatest crotch rocket with a gazillion ponies under our arses?
I get around fine with only 53hp. (and a sackful of torque)
In space, no one can smell your fart.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks