In a society where personal responsibility has been sublimated to over-arching authority (which always knows better) an argument can be constructed for limiting vehicle speed in selected areas such as schools (during set hours) for example.
Given that huge variances in speed-limits in various Western nations clearly prove that all speed limits are entirely arbitrary and thus have no basis in fact. It follows that the continual promotion of the concept that 'speed kills' is pure nonsense except, of course, unless you believe two stationery objects can collide.
Today, and for the first time, I traversed the new Northern Toll motorway, a road equal to any European autobahn, yet there we all were, trudging along at between 100K's (the goody-two-shoes) to 140Ks. And still it seemed slow.
Surely, if all traffic is traveling in the same direction on such wide, sweeping roads such as new motorway, limiting speed to 100Ks cannot be reasonably justified.
Sure, maybe during peak-hour traffic such a limit 'might' be justified, but during the day? Nup. Such a limit is silly.
But the authorities now have relatively cheap technology able to control general speed, minute-by-minute. As we have all seen sundry schools have L.E.D lighted signs requiring a speed reduction to 40Ks during school entry exit times.
Such electronic signs can be manipulated from afar. So why can't we have variable speed limits?
On the section of motorway mentioned above any vehicle with a modestly competent driver could have traveled at 140K, and those who feel threatened always have the left lane. Good drivers with good cars could have easily managed speeds such as are achieved on the European autobahns.
So what are the NZ authorities telling us? Are they saying that NZ drivers are so far below the skill-levels of our European counterparts, or our American counterparts in states which have 'no' maximum limit?
Given that I am peripherally involved with such technology I can assert, without fear of contradiction, that twenty (each-way) solar powered, radio-controlled speed-limit signs could be placed on the new motorway, for less than $200,000 (way less).
Such signage could dictate speeds depending on traffic loading. Such signs could be split to indicate lane speeds. Right Lane. No less than X-Kph. Left Lane no more than X-Kph.
Why should we all be treated like Asian drivers, or generally moronic drivers when such a simple solution is at hand?
Maybe we need to get a hikoi together to make such a thing happen.
Bookmarks