They were saying "than" - it's the Kiwi pronunciation that makes it sound like "then" - have you heard how some Kiwis say Ellen/Allan - can you really tell the difference? And what about bear and beer - another favourite.
They were saying "than" - it's the Kiwi pronunciation that makes it sound like "then" - have you heard how some Kiwis say Ellen/Allan - can you really tell the difference? And what about bear and beer - another favourite.
Who the hell carscares
.
Yeah, I read exerpts from the English language some years ago and I think from memory, I couldn't read back further than about the 16th Cent. It does irk me that people seem to have an almost perverse antagonism to speaking or writing correctly, but I suppose Aristotle would have felt the same. I doubt it's a new problem.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
"Thou" instead of "though" is a vastly more cretinous crime.
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Apparently some of us do. We dont seem to have it no matter which browser we open. We rely on the education we received, our superior intelligence, the dictionary and a shed load of luck to get it right for the most part
Yes I agree, you are an old fart![]()
Almost as bad as the 'there/their/they're' difficulties some people somehow have.
My pet hate is this:
"I should of gone to the movies." "I could of done that."
It's have, FFS!! I should have gone to the movies. I could have done that.
Thank you, as you were.
"I's no' a bobike (motorbike) - i's a scooter!" - MsKABC's son, aged 2 years.
I've managed to largely tune out on the intraweb (forums and the like) because if I can understand it, I figure that it's not an issue. But what really grates with me is when people publish or print with crass errors.
The Herald is prone to awful errors popping up on the website and even in the paper itself. It almost makes me miss England.
But try beating this copy from a large scale bus-stop advert for a pair of real estate agents that appeared a short while ago around here. I don't remember their names but if I ever see either of them, I hope I am not armed:
Other's maybe selling(sic)
Our's are sold
So short and yet, so very wrong. That someone should have paid a printer to waste ink and paper on such an abomination would make me shudder every time I rode past it.
Sadly, most schools teach neither grammar nor spelling effectively: it is no longer a priority and some teachers leave a lot to be desired themselves. Combine that with the fact that so many kids do most of their reading online and I cannot imagine that it is likely to improve.
So ill just have to learn how 2 ignore all there mistake's insted.
Cheers - Chasio
PS Hopefully all errors are deliberate but if not, it's a forum after all!![]()
Last edited by chasio; 8th June 2009 at 21:35. Reason: No-one pinged me for "miss the England" so I'll do it myself!
Here's one for ya then... Say a place called "John's Bar". Take the apostrophe between the 'n' and the 's' in John's. What the fuck is that for? I was taught that an apostrophe denotes a missing letter or letters ie. Don't = do not. I was also taught that in the case of a name preceeding something that belongs to them, the use of an apostrophe denotes the belonging to ie "Johns' Bar", yet I rarely see it used. Proof read this smarty pantses! Or is it "Pants's"? Or "Pants'"?![]()
"Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death" - Hunter S. Thompson
Hey. Well, it is used for contractions, yes. "It is" becoming "it's".
Also to denote ownership, or possessive nouns. "That's John's bike". Not a contraction in that case, just the rule for ownership, John owns the bike.
The apostrophe coming afterward is when there is a plural, using ownership -- or if it is a name that ends in "s" anyway.
For instance: No no, it's Jesus' bike.
Or if it's a possessive plural: "Those are the bikes' attachments". There are multiple bikes, and the attachments belong to them.
"The Johns' Bar" would be correct if 2 or more people by the name of John owned the bar. If there is only one John who owns the bar, it's John's bar.
Clear as mud?
PS: I have no clue, I'm making it up as I go![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks