David Bain's "I shot the Prick" 111 call?

[Mikkel]

Perhaps he had been listening to another Judas Priest album beforehand... you never know.

[Skyryder]

what are you on about the father was covered in blood as well.

for somebody whose signature asks to free scott watson... who actually DID kill 2 people... i think your opinion is pretty void.

There was no blood of Steven's on the father.............not a drop, only a few spots of his own blood....................still have not come up with an answer as to why there was not any on Robin Bain...........if like many do that he killed Steven.


Funny how you think Robin Bain did the killings when there is no evidence for this and Watson DID kill two people where again there is still no evidence that he did..........let alone any bodies.

And my opinion is "void?"


Skyryder

[Maha]

Cl

Some of the posters on KB put the theory forward of this scenario and frankly, to me, it is the only one that makes sense!

Here we go again!

Its what I believed happen John, no arguement there.
He is not guilty of killing his whole family, just the one.

[Skyryder]

Its what I believed happen John, no arguement there.
He is not guilty of killing his whole family, just the one.

There is absolutely no evidence for this at all. None. It's pure speculation put out by those who can not explain why David would kill his entire family. It's the old man. He's the outcast therefore he must have done it. Bollocks.

And as aside too this I recently read that the Bain estate was worth somewhere to the tune of $600,000. Go figure.


Skyryder

[ManDownUnder]

I'm just glad we have another Bain thread... God - it was a whole day without one!

[ManDownUnder]

There is absolutely no evidence for this at all. None.

Agreed - the cops chucked it out...

[oldrider]

He is not guilty... only you survive... you know you did not do it...

Sorry Mark, only David Bain knows the true answer to that question, everything else is emotional conjecture!

Me, I have absolutely no idea but I don't think he should get any compensation without Innocense being less subjective! I.E. Beyond all reasonable doubt!

It's a bit like common sense, whose version is correct?

In Bain's case the jury is the "official" version but..........?

The jury said not guilty on the evidence presented but does the rest of the country agree, beyond all reasonable doubt?

He who pays the piper should call the tune, taxpayers here are paying, so far (as a taxpayer) I don't like the tune?

That's just my personal opinion, unlikely to be taken into account!

[Indoo]

what are you on about the father was covered in blood as well.

for somebody whose signature asks to free scott watson... who actually DID kill 2 people... i think your opinion is pretty void.

I'd say the question is what the hell are you on about. Robin Bain only had a few specks of his own blood on him from after he was shot. He wasn't covered in blood, nor did he have any injuries consistent with being in a struggle, David on the other hand had the blood of the victims on him and had injuries consistent with being in a struggle.

Its interesting that you claim to know for a fact that Robin Bain killed four people, care to lay out the case against Robin?

[Maha]

There is absolutely no evidence for this at all. None. It's pure speculation put out by those who can not explain why David would kill his entire family. It's the old man. He's the outcast therefore he must have done it. Bollocks.


Skyryder

True enough,
I wasn't there at the time so I am basing my 'speculation' on what I have heard over the years (like everyone else is, barr those that really, Bain himself primarily)

Karam on TV the other night....
''Judge to Jury ''you are only ones (public) that have heard every bit of evidence''

Karam went on to say ''whats with all the polls, the public only hear snipts of evidence by whats reported through the media''

[short-circuit]

True enough,
I wasn't there at the time so I am basing my 'speculation' on what I have heard over the years (like everyone else is, barr those that really, Bain himself primarily)

Karam on TV the other night....
''Judge to Jury ''you are only ones (public) that have heard every bit of evidence''

Karam went on to say ''whats with all the polls, the public only hear snipts of evidence by whats reported through the media''

Yeah in between smugly congratulating himself and discussing the toll the whole thing had taken on his life - the egotistical, narcissistic, attention-seeking little weasel

[k14]

Yeah in between smugly congratulating himself and discussing the toll the whole thing had taken on his life - the egotistical, narcissistic, attention-seeking little weasel

Yeah totally agree. When he was shown on the news when the verdict was read he was just lapping up the exposure like a little smug, smarmy prick. I can't work out his actual motive from it all, I don't for one minute believe it was "for the good of an innocent man"...

[ynot slow]

Be interesting if the estate gets finalised and then David is asked to pay some legal fees back,or contribute to Karams bank account.

Still it will be interesting when coroner revues his findings,they can't really change,if they do then it means he was acting on the prosecuting evidence maybe.He comes up with struggles prior to death,and gunshots killed the victims,woohoo bet that was hard to work out.Loss of blood,trauma to main arteries,brain exploding.Be interesting to see findings from Robins autopsy and whether he could have done it.

Sort of still think the old man shot the wife and girls,maybe a struggle with younger son and David over the old man,David acidentally shoots his bro,bro unconcious,kills the old fart,then realises his bro alive goes into finish him off.Far fetched you bet,but not as much as we are led to believe from the puppet master.Has David got a voice,must be mega deals with magazines etc.

[James Deuce]

I saw Jesus on my toast this morning, but I didn't tell everyone about it. Oops.

[Indoo]

Yeah totally agree. When he was shown on the news when the verdict was read he was just lapping up the exposure like a little smug, smarmy prick. I can't work out his actual motive from it all, I don't for one minute believe it was "for the good of an innocent man"...

http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3493...angry_man.html

[ManDownUnder]

http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3493...angry_man.html

LOLOL - touche!