'He killed girlfriend due to emotional pain', court told

[ManDownUnder]

You know that he has admitted killing her, right?

Yup - was referring to my earlier post in respect of Arthur Allen Thomas.

Only in that the defence lawyers aren't also shot when losing a case.

I also think they should consider shooting the prosecution and the police involded if an innocent person is convicted. But seeing as we can't bring the dead back to life, I say too fucking bad, Harden up.

And don't get me started on piss weak judges and that stupid bitch who wants to see an amnesty for prisoners.

chk chk boom.

Troll - find thy bridge and be gone

[davebullet]

A coupla things:
Regardless of whatever the jury decided, he's unlikely to go and kill another girlfriend.
Regardless of what the sentence is, he doesn't seem to have any guilt about what he's done, or to have even accepted responsibility.

I think someone that snaps like that and stabs someone 200 something times could do this again. I don't think 200 times was a conscious count. Sounds like his mind went apeshit and turned into a killing machine. IF he can't remember the incident and doesn't avoid situations that trigger that reaction in the future, he could do so again.

I agree with you that prison time doesn't do justice to the life he has taken. I really feel sad for that young woman and her family and the devastation he's caused.

If there is some other form of justice, he will be a target in prison. He'll either become someone's bitch, be made to do disgusting things or come to some grief (loss of limb, bodily function or possibly life).

[Headbanger]

Troll - find thy bridge and be gone

Yeah, That will work.

Muhahahahaha

chk chk boom.

Lets not be silly and try and align my comment of shooting this fucker in anyway to the case you mentioned. They are so far apart you do yourself a disservice by trying to force a comparison, The fucker was seen to stab her to death, and never denied doing so.

[gwigs]

I,d like to get 6 members of the victims family and issue them with a baseball bat and pair of Doc Martens each.......lock the smug F***k in a room with them for 20 mins...... if hes still alive after that then jail him for life..

[YellowDog]

Did anyone at all actually believe this guy had any kind of case?

Even his legal represenation did not appear as being convinced or convincing.

[imdying]

Yup - was referring to my earlier post in respect of Arthur Allen Thomas.

Mmmm, I realise that... what I can't figure out is why you would bring up his case when it bears absolutely no relation to this one? The suggestion was that in that case it would be appropriate to put a bullet in self confessed murderer, not to put a bullet in every convicted person.

[Genestho]

If he gets done for murder, there won't be a story in it, no diverting entertainment, no morning tea rants, no millions of words on Internet forums and the Sensible Sentencing Trust will be left without a platform.

Don't worry JD, SST already have 100 or so victims and families of violent crimes and murders that are together by choice, with which to change victims rights for the future, thanks.

Gosh hope you're never a victim of a violent act dude!

[Scouse]

No. He has to be sentenced yet. What's the bet he gets less than 20 years? He will be looked after, a nice cell with underfloor heating, TV, 3 meals a day at the taxpayers expence. Not what he deserves.

At least this jury wasn't as gullible as bains Jury.

[James Deuce]

Don't worry JD, SST already have 100 or so victims and families of violent crimes and murders that are together by choice, with which to change victims rights for the future.

Gosh hope you're never a victim of a violent act dude!

Errr, I think you've read that a little wrong? Perhaps?

At the end of the day I don't think anyone gives a rat's banana for Sophie Elliot, just like I don't think anyone gives a rat's banana about whether or not I've faced a violent act or not. I have, more than once, however I don't categorise myself a "victim" nor would I be looking for help from Garth McVicar and cronies.

The Middle Ages have ended and the mono-browed retribution freaks need to get over it. The Spanish Inquisition is no longer recruiting.

[ManDownUnder]

Mmmm, I realise that... what I can't figure out is why you would bring up his case when it bears absolutely no relation to this one?

No worries - I'm not sure if you saw this.

Fair question - and no - I'm not comparing cases, simply recognising we have the same judicial and trial system in place and while good - it's not perfect.

Inherant in that statement is the firm belief of one law for all. No exceptions, even extreme ones.

The suggestion was that in that case it would be appropriate to put a bullet in self confessed murderer, not to put a bullet in every convicted person.

Because there are occasions that won't work either... but that's a whole other argument, separate thread etc

[Headbanger]

At the end of the day I don't think anyone gives a rat's banana for Sophie Elliot, just like I don't think anyone gives a rat's banana about whether or not I've faced a violent act or not.

Well, I give a fuck about people getting murdered, and being the target of violent acts.

Jaded much?

[Finn]

If there is some other form of justice, he will be a target in prison. He'll either become someone's bitch, be made to do disgusting things or come to some grief (loss of limb, bodily function or possibly life).

I reckon he will top himself before Christmas. Remember this post...

[RC1]

I reckon he will top himself before Christmas. Remember this post...

dont know about topped but beaten and raped most probably

[Edbear]

I reckon he will top himself before Christmas. Remember this post...

Possibly. He's unstable mentally and thinks he's done nothing wrong. He reminds my family of another person of similar nature in his speeches to the court. This other person wouldn't top himself though. So it will be interesting to see how long he survives and whether, and how, he meets his end.

[ready4whatever]

they should just execute him