Are you a bit simple?, You have no comprehension of Wanganui or our Mayor, and your comments are borderline retarded. Sure as hell have nothing to do with reality.You should seriously learn to shut the fuck up. Fools like yourself are the last people that should be contributing to any debate. Fuck your dumb.
The abuse is fitting. A spade is a spade. Somethings have no room for debate.
Law's leadership style brings out the very worst in people, his efforts so far have created division both within Wanganui and NZ. Someone with true vision would be welcoming the opportunity to get the local Iwi onside [people who may have some influence over gangs], by putting the 'H' into Wanganui.
Instead he chases the red neck votes and abuses school kids.
So, he should go against the will of the people who elected him in order to placate a minority of a minority who never gave a damn until they found the could use it as political leverage?
And this makes him a cunt and a totalitarian dictator.
Your a Jafa right?
Not sure what my background has anything to do with Law's performance or your personal view of me?......For the record, I'm English and have lived many years in the U.K, the Gold Coast and NZ.
Putting numbers to who voted for what and how Law's is representing his voters is unlikely to be dealt with fairly on this forum. Fair to say that most voters did not vote Law's in just to keep the 'H' out of Wanganui......Political leverage is a strong term to use for a simple phonetic name change.
I think you have lost perspective, there must be far more important issues in Wanganui, and I think its interesting that Law's has rather skillfully made this the major problem and that people buy his shit!
You do realise Laws runs city wide referendums that are binding on the council and so far two of them have addressed the H inclusion and at the last one 77 percent of voters rejected it?
Funny way for a totalitarian dictator to act?
You do realise Wanganui has been the centre of the separatist movement (now that's some real world division tactics) for 20 years and we have all sorts of bullshit going on here in that time?
But no, you wouldn't know, Your local understanding is zero, as demonstrated by the fairyland bullshit that somehow laws embracing a race based agenda against the will of the people that live here would cause the local IWI to do something about the gangs....as if they could, Those fuckers don't give a fuck.
LMFAO, I saw a mobster with his P woman in the shop the other day, I should have asked his scribble face if he'd change his ways if we added an H. Though he'd probably just be thinking he should have stabbed me in the face before I opened my mouth.
'Local bullshit' as you call it should be viewed as a challenge to a REAL leader, and not something to cause further division [as Law's is doing].......His totalitarian behaviour therefore is not in the best interests of NZ. As for who voted for what, 77% is a number that still might not encompass the collective view of the community, many might not bother voting; additionally as previously mentioned having a fair discussion without cold hard facts does not help either party!?
Your view is certainly badly tainted and hardly representative-Law's feeds off your fear and closed mind.
Ah, so after having the highest yet reply for a referendum and receiving massive support for the direction taken we should instead count all the people who didn't bother to contribute and just imagine they opposed it strongly and we should do what we imagine all these imaginary votes would have said in your imagination?
Seriously, You ever heard of democracy?, what is inherent in a democratic action that you would oppose it, and at that oppose it with such uninformed dribble. This carry on about totalitarian behaviour is just odd.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks