Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 197

Thread: The AA are lying about us.

  1. #16
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    The way to change the AA 'directions' is from within. But none of 'us' can be fucked doing it.

    I'll be pleasantly surprised if more than a 15 turn up for the BRONZ agm tonight - let alone fraternise with an out of touch car mob.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,398
    [youtube]J6_1Pw1xm9U[/youtube]
    I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave

  3. #18
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post
    You've been listening to Katman too much.
    Well you clearly haven't been listening enough.

    I've never said motorcycles were dangerous - in fact, I don't think they are.

    It's the motorcyclists on them that can make motorcycling dangerous.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post
    It wouldn't surprise me. Our beloved leaders probably see motorcyclists as irresponsible, low intellect, low income and quite probably drug users, or just another form of boy racer.
    And if that's not enough incentive to try changing the way the we are perceived then I have no idea what is.

    I've said it plenty of times - if we want to be seen as responsible, mature and intelligent road users then we have to start acting as such. That includes publicly condemning those motorcyclists who ride irresponsibly.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 15:56
    Bike
    Triumph's answer to the GN250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,037
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    And if that's not enough incentive to try changing the way the we are perceived then I have no idea what is.

    I've said it plenty of times - if we want to be seen as responsible, mature and intelligent road users then we have to start acting as such. That includes publicly condemning those motorcyclists who ride irresponsibly.
    Actually I agree with you there Katman, but I'm not sure how many motorcyclists out there ride irresponsibly. Sure, the Akaroa GP attracts it's share of idiots (one of the reasons I never ride that road in the weekends), and then you get the badass 1%er showing his workmates at the accounting firm how tough he is by riding at full throttle in traffic on his Harley, but I think most serious motorcyclists are pretty responsible.

    And we don't have a public voice, so condemning the idiots is pretty well limited to around a fire at a rally, in a pub or on here; none of which are accessible to the general public.
    Don't blame me, I voted Green.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post
    I would be very, very surprised if 81% of motorcycle fatalities were the fault of the rider and that only 9% were caused by car drivers given that international statistics show that the other road user was primarily at fault in between 50 and 65% of accidents and road conditions were at fault in 12 - 20% of cases (depending which country you look at).
    Trawl through the threads on here relating to motorcycle fatalities and you'll find very few where the motorcyclist wasn't entirely responsible for, or at least contributed to, the accident.

    (And by 'contributed to' I mean 'significantly influenced').

  7. #22
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 15:56
    Bike
    Triumph's answer to the GN250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,037
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    Trawl through the threads on here relating to motorcycle fatalities and you'll find very few where the motorcyclist wasn't entirely responsible for, or at least contributed to, the accident.
    I'm sorry, I don't see KB threads as being a valid source of research data, and from what I've seen here almost every crash is apparently caused by a "cage".
    Don't blame me, I voted Green.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post
    I'm sorry, I don't see KB threads as being a valid source of research data, and from what I've seen here almost every crash is apparently caused by a "cage".
    There are plenty of threads on here that, while not necessarily providing much in the way of concrete research data, clearly offer enough information to show the rider at fault.

    I'd suggest you're just too scared to allow yourself to be confronted by the ugly truth.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    16th May 2010 - 12:51
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT250
    Location
    Kapiti Coast
    Posts
    14
    The AA have no Credibility.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 10:28
    Bike
    Goose
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    7,719
    Quote Originally Posted by -Alias- View Post
    The AA have no Credibility.
    Exactly what I was trying to get at.....

  11. #26
    Join Date
    11th June 2006 - 15:52
    Bike
    Suzuki GSX1250FA, TGB 50cc moped
    Location
    Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    There are plenty of threads on here that, while not necessarily providing much in the way of concrete research data, clearly offer enough information to show the rider at fault.

    I'd suggest you're just too scared to allow yourself to be confronted by the ugly truth.
    The ugly truth is we are good riders, and getting better.

    Source http://www.transport.govt.nz/researc...%20version.pdf


    Summary from the above, table 32 , per 10,000 motorcyclists

    Year Crashes Injuries Fatalities

    1951 454 451 19
    1961 394 391 10.3
    1971 473 516 9.2
    1981 247 254 8.7
    1991 270 283 10.7
    2001 114 116 6.1
    2004 121 123 5.8
    2008 142 144 5.2

    Who causes the crash ?

    71% of crashes were collisions
    Motorcyclist primarily responsible for 35% or about 1/3 of collisions

    i.e. 2/3rds of collisions are caused by the motorist not the motorcyclist

    Of all crashes including single vehicle ones, the motorcyclist was primarily responsible for 51%.

    Note : When statistics indicate motorcyclists are primarily responsible for 51% of crashes, this actually indicates a good standard of driving.

    Consider a population of 100 vehicles.
    If they all crash in single vehicle crashes, then they are primarily responsible for 100% of crashes.
    If they all crash into another vehicle, they are primarily responsible for 50% of crashes.

    Real world drivers could expect to be halfway between these two extremes at 75% so 51% is statistically significant as a good outcome.

    EDIT..

    That doesnt mean we should just sit back, we can all become better riders. But it does mean we don't need to react by adding extra laws and controls, to what is already a very regulated riding environment.

    I see the Coroner in tears today, as his proposals for compulsory helmets, roll cages, seatbelts, wofs and regos for quads has gone un-noticed.
    David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 15:56
    Bike
    Triumph's answer to the GN250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,037
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    The way to change the AA 'directions' is from within. But none of 'us' can be fucked doing it.

    I'll be pleasantly surprised if more than a 15 turn up for the BRONZ agm tonight - let alone fraternise with an out of touch car mob.
    I wonder if it isn't time to rebrand BRONZ?
    Don't blame me, I voted Green.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    5th November 2009 - 09:50
    Bike
    GSXR750, KTM350EXCF
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,264
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post

    "There were about 43 motorcyclist deaths, of which motorcyclists themselves were responsible for 35. Car drivers were responsible for four".
    .
    A bit off topic but who caused the other 4 deaths?
    43 deaths
    bikes 35 + cars 4 = 39

  14. #29
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,020
    Quote Originally Posted by davereid View Post
    Summary from the above, table 32 , per 10,000 motorcyclists
    I think you'll find that those stats are per 10,000 motorcycles, not motorcyclists. (Can't seem to open the link).

    Therefore they are completely misleading. The number of motorcycles still in existence has risen considerably faster than the number of motorcyclists.

    That's a pivotal factor that even Shrub's revered Professor Lamb has chosen to ignore.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by shrub View Post
    I wonder if it isn't time to rebrand BRONZ?
    We did. The whole thing is as good as can be expected from volunteers.

    To make anything work fully would need to re-brand bikers.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •