Key comes out

[Jantar]

So? The man has a sense of humour. That's a huge improvement over the last 2 PMs we've had. Heil Clarke thought it was funny to falsly claim a painting as her own, and Battleshipply wouldn't know humour unless someone held a card saying "Laugh".

[Skyryder]

Helen's gone. Get over it. I have.

Skyryder

[JimO]

Helen's gone. Get over it. I have.

Skyryder

really, did you cry??

[Skyryder]

Remember it was Key's government that increased our registation fees, or have all you Key apologists all forgotten?

Skyryder

[carbonhed]

Helen's gone. Get over it. I have.

Skyryder

Hell I hope I never get over it! Brings a smile to my face every time I think of her pissing away every shred of integrity in the pursuit of power only to have her arse handed to her while she still desperately wanted "Her precioussssss"

If JK never does another thing he'll have my undying gratitude for that.

[tri boy]

Remember it was Key's government that increased our registation fees, all have you Key apologists all forgotten?

Skyryder

Twas your mongrel bitch govt that help blow the ACC budget to the shit house.
Next.

[Skyryder]

You obviously haven't seen as many as I have!

The jury is still out on this guy for me!

So far he just looks like a "new rich guy" on a charity and photo opportunity bender!

( like the fat kid bouncing on the diving board while the rest of the school waits, look at me, look at me.)

I voted guilty the moment he was caught lying about TranzRail.


Skyrder

[Skyryder]

Twas your mongrel bitch govt that help blow the ACC budget to the shit house. Next.

So you never went on the protest ride?

Skyrder

[Skyryder]

Works for me!

Plus everybody gets to see the lefty vermin tie themselves in knots explaining why it's OK to contemplate letting that POS back anywhere near government.

Please feel free to keep on debasing yourselves.

Ohh Pleeease give me a break.

Key rejecting Peter’s as a coalition partner simply alludes to the reality that they were never going to work together due to both personality and policy differences. That some commentators see this ‘spin’ as evidence of principles defies belief.

Skyryder

[R6_kid:Me]

Helen's gone. Get over it. I have.

Skyryder

And now you have Phil Goff. Oh how I lol.

[oldrider]

Twas your mongrel bitch (Liabour) govt that help blow the ACC budget to the shit house.
Next.

True!

But then National fucked it by (Nick Smith) telling all those lies about ACC instead of just getting on with opening it up for competition again, "that", I could have understood and lived with!

Also, knowing they were facing defeat at the election Labour cleaned out the coffers buying back that antique broken down toy railway!

Pity they didn't get back in and have to face cleaning up their own mess but I guess there would have been no tomorrow for us either after that!

[carbonhed]

Ohh Pleeease give me a break.

Key rejecting Peter’s as a coalition partner simply alludes to the reality that they were never going to work together due to both personality and policy differences. That some commentators see this ‘spin’ as evidence of principles defies belief.

Skyryder

Peters is a corrupt, xenophobic, demagogue with a side of narcissistic personality disorder... so you got the personality differences bit right Maybe you'll get the extra "sweetener" of Michael laws? How do you manage not to vomit at the thought?

Which "baubles of office" are you going to give him this time? Racing perhaps? The lizard would love Foreign Affairs.

Please feel free to continue debasing yourself.

[Skyryder]

Peters is a corrupt, xenophobic, demagogue with a side of narcissistic personality disorder... so you got the personality differences bit right Maybe you'll get the extra "sweetener" of Michael laws? How do you manage not to vomit at the thought?

Which "baubles of office" are you going to give him this time? Racing perhaps? The lizard would love Foreign Affairs.

Please feel free to continue debasing yourself.

Even If you are right about Peters he is just above 5% in the latest Morgan poll. Your comments in no way address the issue that I raised in my last post.

There are plenty of my posts concerning Lhaw's. Do your home work sony and you may not make such a fool of yourself by bringing NZ's most obnoxious radio host into this debate.

Skyryder

[carbonhed]

Even If you are right about Peters he is just above 5% in the latest Morgan poll. Your comments in no way address the issue that I raised in my last post.

There are plenty of my posts concerning Lhaw's. Do your home work sony and you may not make such a fool of yourself by bringing NZ's most obnoxious radio host into this debate.

Skyryder

Sony? Who the fuck is Sony?

You're going to be down in the gutter working with the Lizard and Laws because that's precisely where you belong. Covered from head to toe in shit but gamely trying to smile and shake the voters hand.


Here's Matt McCarten's take on it..

"But the real stinger that deserves high praise was Key’s kneecapping of National nemesis Winston Peters.

Over recent months Peters has been slowly but consistently gaining support in the polls to the point where he could quite possibly once again have become the kingmaker in any post-election negotiations.

In one swipe Key has almost certainly dealt Peters a mortal blow. More importantly he got Goff as well. It’s a bold and gutsy move. Key made his fortune by taking calculated risks and he’s made what I suspect is a winning chess move. …

In one swoop Key gives us two choices of government after the election – a government led by him or a Labour/NZ First/Greens alternative. Voters make your choice.

I was astonished Goff and Peters claimed Key was naive and arrogant. It was a masterstroke."

You're not the sharpest knife in the draw so you can't see it but please feel free to continue debasing yourself.

[Skyryder]

In one swoop Key gives us two choices of government after the election – a government led by him or a Labour/NZ First/Greens alternative. Voters make your choice.

I was astonished Goff and Peters claimed Key was naive and arrogant. It was a masterstroke."

You're not the sharpest knife in the draw so you can't see it but please feel free to continue debasing yourself.

There was only ever a government led by Goff or Key. Key’s rejection of Peter’s has not altered any thing other than reduce Key’s choices.

Take a look at your comment on Goff and Peter’s. You state that Goff and Peter’s comment on Key as being naïve is a master stroke. I don’t think that is what you meant, but that is what you wrote. And I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer?

Bye bye sony. Go back to school and learn comprehension.


Skyryder