Thanks for the help guys and yeah this is what im asking??, so its more the fact that they are not technically a bucket racer even though they pretty much fit the rules of the class??? and the riding style is different???.
I have personally raced Pit Motards at the Karts Track here in Dunedin in the bucket class, cool track and good fun but not to many entries, so just want to get more people interested down here.
End of day its all about having fun, smaller bikes are never going to be taken to serious...
Anyway thanks for your help but after reading all this don't think we will be pushing Pit Motard racing to much apart from in home town as seems to be to much negativity towards them in NZ.
Here's a solution.
start a pitbike club; write some rules (covering everything including safety) and get them approved by MNZ.
Then get all the riders involved licensed.
the enter discussions with kart/race tracks etc for access.. sort out volunteers/race organisers etc. and then start racing.
Maybe at that stage; then the bucket boys might co-share events (not the same races)??
notwithstanding the fact that there has been long standing issues with bikes on kart track around the country; due to the perception that bikes do a lot more damage (don't forget to cover this off in ya rules as well)....
The general consensus on in this forum (generally visited by people that have been involved in F4/F5 for a significant length of time) is that these don't meet the spirit of the class. of note seen any supermotards in superlight (F3) lately; why is that??
You don't really know the history of buckets then....
comments like that will never endear you to this crowd.
Bingo. so who's going to write the submission??
Don't bother, road racers have their heads too far up their own asses to think that anything like this can be raced. Look how many whinge about motards on trackdays etc.
I laugh at the 'don't take you foot off the pegs' rule too, wtf does that accomplish? Never seen a leg get in the way of a bike before...
We wouldn't want to encourage anyone to go racing now, would we...
Drew for Prime Minister!
www.oldskoolperformance.com
www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )
Drew for Prime Minister!
www.oldskoolperformance.com
www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )
You know that wasn't the issue; the original issue was lines and lack of control mid corner. a few ruined it for the rest mind due.
I doubt people have an issue around someone actually building up a class and sorting out there own meeting.... why just because it has the same engine size, do people automatically assume that its all good as a bucket. isn't the the purpose of this thread; someone ask if it was suitable the answer so far has been generally no (as every other time someone has brought it up on this forum).
nice rebuttal....
What we do get sick of is people who don't race in the class telling us how it should be. That gets boring real quick & you wonder why such people troll around,
perhaps they should find some rugby forum to go tell other people who don't play how it should be done.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
I still reckon there should be an "unlimited" class. Turbo's etc. Then you would see some real creativity.
I mean lets face it - this is the only reason why people watch Pikes Peak and Gold Rush.
Hell half the time people are so amazed by the vehicles they forget to find out who won.
To put this back on topic. How about a 100cc unlimited class. Do whatever you want but keep the bike under 100cc.
Now that would be interesting to watch. I imagine walking through the pits would get more attention than a superbike meet.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Nah, if you want real tech innovation, specify a starting energy amount. Then you can have 2Ts, 4Ts, deisles, electrics, turbines, get all the crazy coming out of the woodwork there. And it encourages fuel efficient engines, so you'd have direct benefit to road vehicles too!
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
As for the leg thing, we didn't come up with the idea just to be pricks, we have had a number of damn close calls at mt Wellington in the last couple of months, and with the whole duty of care framework we have to work with these days a call had to be made.
As for encouraging people to go racing of course we do, that would be why the club has a loan bike for people to try, why we give complete newbies as much help as we can and the track to themselves while they need it, have set up multiple grades, blah blah blah...
What we don't want to encourage is people turning up with bikes that aren't suitable and or legal when there are plenty of legal options for around the same price.
As for the spirit of the rules, nice idea but it's a bit hard to get on a protest form and taken seriously.
If people want to buy a bike new, off the shelf and go racing, there are no options in road racing that I can see so best to go and play in the dirt. Buckets are probably the most open of all the road race classes today without opening the doors to questionable bikes that aren't suited to racing with the large number of legal bikes already out there.
I probably should ignore these trolls, the only way to educate them going by past experience is with a bullet.
Stock is best
And they are certainly self righteous trolls. For the record, Henk, myself & a heck of a lot of Bucket guys are dirtbike riders, so don't try that bullshit. Heck we just want to have fun racing in a class that has been fun & has large fields without screwing it up.
I'm not about to go telling the Posties what should & shouldn't be allowed. Its not my class. I wonder why people do?
I don't think the OP was out of order asking the question, but the trolls are tiresome at best.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks