This has some info on that, although it's very vague on km's or hours.
http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/raci...-halfway-2013/
I'm sure two strokes can be built to last just as long as the four strokes. Same with Rotaries. But back when they were mobile smoke screens there weren't any restrictions on how long they had to last or emissions regulations at the tracks etc.
Again, I would love to see the rules opened up so any sort of engine can be used.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/196...o_the_end.html
Lorenzo has to hang in there,fight and wait for MM to cock it up. Something he has yet to do.
He was a very lucky little fella there, so fast. I'm meaning a collarbone or something that means he can't ride ?
I don't believe he can put it off, the spectacular way he rides, no matter how good he is. Oh to be 20 and bullet proof.
But hey, it might not happen this year or for a while ! He should be the champ ? His to lose now.
ps Raining in there ? I need some new rubber.
pps Go Rossi ! heh heh !
Evidently somebody named Crighton has been listening to you MT.
Disclaimer: I don't actually know what I'm talking about and everything I say should be taken as words of wisdom from a armchair general/mechanic/engineer/racer.
I was sort of assuming that they had already applied the FIM formula..........................and got 700cc (meaning a total swept area of 350cc) Not sure since the specs don't note that. The overall size of the engine is pretty tiny (comparing it in my head to my old 12A/13B) which is why I thought it was 350cc (FIM 700cc). But then that would be a rediculous amount of power out of an engine that size, so it must be a 700cc (FIM 1400cc).
Right, so yeah, it's a little big to race in WSBK or MotoGP type deal, but at least they seem to be working on the overall concept.
(That is all assuming the FIM formula for rotaries is 2x swept area for displacement. Is that correct, or is it around 1.6 to 1.7????)
Disclaimer: I don't actually know what I'm talking about and everything I say should be taken as words of wisdom from a armchair general/mechanic/engineer/racer.
the 588 Nortons were 588 swept, but the Brits gave them a bit of a leg up in the British races.
as this one is bigger and more HP. I am confident that he is talking swept.
last time i seen the rules in an old MNZ book it was 2x swept. for the FIM.
The car world applies x1.7 i think.
i think the later MNZ rules are very unspecific..............
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
http://www.motogp.com/en/news/2013/S...n+Repsol+Honda
I reckon that's bullshit. He fucked up his braking, but that happens every race to multiple people.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
Very minor incident agreed, but fairly serous outcome for Pedrosa. I'm actually not surprised that there was a penalty, neither am I surprised if it has no immediate effect.
Following that incident even HRC said Marquez needs to change his style. The problem has arisen because he should have been banged harder, earlier, when it would have been justified, but he wasn't. So now Race Direction have to make their point over a very minor incident.
Hopefully Marquez will get the message - but I wouldn't bet on it. Going by his previous performance they could start him from the back of the grid and he'd still win anyway.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks