Drug testing?

[nodrog:Me]

So if a Paedophile applied for a babysitting job, and they asked "do you like fucking kids?" and he said "yeah I do, but I haven't fucked any for 4 weeks, and I still like to, but I wont while I look after your kids". That would be sweet as.

[onearmedbandit]

So if a Paedophile applied for a babysitting job, and they asked "do you like fucking kids?" and he said "yeah I do, but I haven't fucked any for 4 weeks, and I still like to, but I wont while I look after your kids". That would be sweet as.

Come on I'd expect better trolling than that from you.

[nodrog:Me]

Come on I'd expect better trolling than that from you.

Im not trolling, im trying to apply stoner logic to the situation.

[Katman]

The problem/issue you are stuck on is the test doesn't or can't show impairment.....

The swab test at least indicates whether the usage was recent or not.

[haydes55]

And maybe someone who would pass a swab and fail a urine test could still be impaired.

[jasonu]

The swab test at least indicates whether the usage was recent or not.

Do they use that test at the track?

[Katman]

Do they use that test at the track?

Did you even read post #1?

[Katman]

And maybe someone who would pass a swab and fail a urine test could still be impaired.

Here you go - educate yourself.

http://www.forensicfluids.com/oral_v_urine.htm

http://drugtestaustraliablog.blogspo...g-testing.html

http://www.nadcp.org/sites/default/f...20Cheaters.pdf

[haydes55]

Here you go - educate yourself.



http://www.forensicfluids.com/oral_v_urine.htm

Funny how that website sells oral testing..... I bet a website selling urine testing will highlight different points.

That site also says urine will show THC up to an average of 24 hours to 120 hours. So more often than not, smoking within a week of racing will be picked up, but past 5 days would be less common to get a positive result.

Posting biased references won't win you an argument.

[Katman]

Posting biased references won't win you an argument.

Type 'oral versus urine drug testing' into Google and do your own research then.

[onearmedbandit]

Im not trolling, im trying to apply stoner logic to the situation.

Shit then it's a pretty piss poor analogy.

[nodrog:Me]

Shit then it's a pretty piss poor analogy.

whatever, it had heaps of anal in it.

[onearmedbandit]

whatever, it had heaps of anal in it.

That it did!

[Biggles08]

I'm lost. How is that making anyone superior? It's about removing drugs from a dangerous sport. You are right about removing legal highs. I'm trying to find out info on that.

Where your logic flaws me is that because legal highs mightn't be picked up we shouldn't test for weed? I'd rather test for 90% of drugs than 20% of drugs.

It's not ideal, but better than just letting it slide and putting competitors in undue risk.

I don't give a shit if anyone wants to follow Amy Winehouse and take care of themselves, but as soon as other people have their lives in your hands, you have a legal and moral obligation to do all within your power to take your responsibility with due care. Taking any drugs shows you have no care for others lives.

Your problem is you are making wayyy too much sense for Kiwibiker. This is entertainment for the likes of KATMAN and he really doesn't give a flying fuck about how serious this issue is in NZ. He will never understand how bad it is to have ANY mind altering substances in your system and go racing...he doesn't give a fuck cause this is a game to him...unlike those who have died in the past because they were not 100% kosher. People like this are a waste of both yours and my time. Let it go.

[Katman]

Your problem is you are making wayyy too much sense for Kiwibiker. This is entertainment for the likes of KATMAN and he really doesn't give a flying fuck about how serious this issue is in NZ. He will never understand how bad it is to have ANY mind altering substances in your system and go racing...he doesn't give a fuck cause this is a game to him...unlike those who have died in the past because they were not 100% kosher. People like this are a waste of both yours and my time. Let it go.

So let's recap......

I find it incredible that no effort seems to be going into testing for legal highs and I think it's morally inept to condemn someone for showing a trace of THC in their system instead of trying to determine whether they are actually impaired, and yet you think it's me who's treating this subject lightly?

I hope you're better at racing than you are at participating in a grown-ups conversation.