Kiwis fighting for Free Syrian Army, ISIS, Hezbollah, etc

[Akzle]

Na just proving that you only half correct, pretty much story of your life.

It's simple, Unlawful sexual connection. It would be in the case you state without consent of the male. There is case law but you can search for it yourself or get some dick head lawyer on here to do it for you.

Section 196 is not new and the whole domestic thing has been ongoing for years. Much like speeding and drink driving. Who knows in the future there could be a Female Assaults Male charge carrying two years.

Soooooo back onto topic and not NZ law.

nah see you said i was wrong, so prove it rather than distracting by adding three more unrelated topics.

We all know you are a fat middle aged white guy cruising sites pretending to be a blond 16 year old girl.

All the while typing with one hand as the other is gripping your "ahem" joystick.

what i do in my spare time is my business.
also, trolling (for) 16 year old girls is perfectly legal,
and trolling 16 year old girls is a good way to increase trollpoints.

[jahrasti]

nah see you said i was wrong, so prove it rather than distracting by adding three more unrelated topics.

.

If you google unlawful sexual connection it's all there. I don't have to prove anything as it can quite easily be found on a public domain.

You see I very rarely quote shit word for word as you can look for yourself, you won't believe it anyway.

I see it as giving you a hand up not a hand out.

Nobel peace prize here I come.

[jahrasti]

sorry your jewness, but unlawful sexual connection is usually man v boy or in addition to a rape charge man v woman. case law says so.

google me wrong, if you can, otherwise, you're just talking shit.

Ho hum ho mo ho hum.

Read this jackass. Your post shows you awesome intelligence (that sounds like an oxymoron)

In the words of the great fuckstick Joe KARAM. Game set match.

Unlawful Sexual Connection is defined in the Crimes Act 1961 as:
“Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B –
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection ;and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.”
This means that unlawful sexual connection covers any sexual contact that happens without consent: ie. Male to female, female to male, male to male, and female to female. Sexual connection includes anal and genital penetration of one person by any part of another or by an object held or manipulated. It also includes oral sex, which is the touching of the lips to the genitals (either giving or receiving).

[Voltaire]

White society invented the internet, smash you modem to bits before its too late....

[ellipsis]

White society invented the internet, smash you modem to bits before its too late....

...too late...

[jahrasti]

i know how its defined in legislation cumstain. My position is that it is rarely if ever used m v f at crown caught.
Prove me wrong.

No friendy for you, youre too stupid.
Try nzlii.org rather than jewgle.
You might fuken learn something.

Wrong again chump, sorry champ but you can still be my special friend

If you want accurate case law then brookers/Thomson Reuters or westlaw as it is now is where you need to go. But it isn't free.

nzlii.org is basic and not what you are looking for.

But hey you will simply argue the point no matter what even if you are wrong.

As for putting up the specific case law, go digitally penetrate yourself and access a law society computer yourself, or a computer or anyone else that has access for that matter.

Have a nice day.

[Akzle]

Wrong again chump, sorry champ but you can still be my special friend

If you want accurate case law then brookers/Thomson Reuters or westlaw as it is now is where you need to go. But it isn't free.

nzlii.org is basic and not what you are looking for.

But hey you will simply argue the point no matter what even if you are wrong.

As for putting up the specific case law, go digitally penetrate yourself and access a law society computer yourself, or a computer or anyone else that has access for that matter.

Have a nice day.

so youve got nothing?

[Voltaire]

Its like being a regular at a bar and watching new bloke get stuck with the boring old bastard.
" I come here as no one else will listen to me.."

[Akzle]

Its like being a regular at a bar and watching new bloke get stuck with the boring old bastard.
" I come here as no one else will listen to me.."

no one here listens to me, whats your point?

[jahrasti]

Its like being a regular at a bar and watching new bloke get stuck with the boring old bastard.
" I come here as no one else will listen to me.."

To be honest I enjoy it, I have been coming for a while but I stand in the shadows and laugh at my bff Axezeal hitting on all the boys.

[jahrasti]

Plus it helps with my shaheed to paradise (just putting it back on track)

[oldrider]

Its like being a regular at a bar and watching new bloke get stuck with the boring old bastard.
" I come here as no one else will listen to me.."

With a little bit of luck .. you may live long enough to become the boring old bastard .. in fact evidence suggests you are well on track!

[ellipsis]

...this is probably supposed to be funny as it arrived in my junk mail, but it just about ties up all the loose ends for me...

--------------------------------------------------------



Are you confused by what is going on in the Middle East ? Let me explain.
We support the Iraqi government in the fight against ISIS.
We don’t like ISIS, but ISIS is supported by Saudi Arabia who we do like.
We don’t like Assad in Syria. We support the fight against him, but ISIS is also fighting against him.
We don’t like Iran, but Iran supports the Iraqi government in its fight against ISIS.
So some of our friends support our enemies, some enemies are now our friends,
and some of our enemies are fighting against our other enemies, who we want to lose,
but we don’t want our enemies who are fighting our enemies to win.
If the people we want to defeat are defeated, they could be replaced by people we like even less.
And all this was started by us invading a country to drive out terrorists
who were not actually there until we went in to drive them out.
It's quite simple, really. Do you understand it now ?

[Banditbandit]

My friend Axel did, we are bro's for life.

Yeah - I saw that. He's a dumbass - tho' you've probably noticed that ... we keep him for laughs.

And there is no such charge as Rape in Godzone anymore ... It's Sexual Violation or Unlawful Sexual Connection.

Here's the current law ... (not hard to find if you look for the Crimes Act ) Section 128, part three would mean a woman can be chargted with Unlawful Sexual Connection ..

128 Sexual violation defined

(1) Sexual violation is the act of a person who—

(a) rapes another person; or

(b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person.

(2) Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B's genitalia by person A's penis,—

(a) without person B's consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

(3) Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—

(a) without person B's consent to the connection; and

(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

(4) One person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to each other.

[ellipsis]

....many years ago, legend has it, our towns new silver band were performing at a fairly important local civic function. Many dignitaries were present including the circuit judge who was there to try or pass judgement on miscreants who were locked up.

After the function and celebrations which went on for a while, one of the musicians who had celebrated a bit too much ended up being put to bed in a strange bed, where he woke in the morning to a sore arse and a bloke beside him.

He laid a complaint with the law about this violation and as the circuit judge was in town, the case came before the bench that afternoon. The judge who had also been celebrating a little too much, heard the plaintiff's plea and without too much consideration, came to a 'not guilty, case dismissed', decision.

When asked later by the cop who ran the place about his decision to not prosecute the bloke charged, his reply was, 'Did you hear the band playing?. I truly believe that they all need fucking'.

(what has this got to do with terrorists...fuck all)