The article didn't say, though it certainly implies he shot the woman once as she was running away, and then a second time to finish her off.
""I come back and they see me with a gun, and they run," Mr Greer said."
Like I said, "It isn't self defense if your attacker is incapacitated and begging for mercy. At that point it becomes the dishing out of personal justice."
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Maybe he couldn't give her any mercy because some thieving pricks had broken into his home and stolen his entire supply of mercy.
I think any recipient of mercy should be deserving. If someone gives no mercy to others they harm then by their actions they have chosen to forfeit any right or claim to receive mercy from others
Happiness is a means of travel, not a destination
Was she running to get a weapon and resume the attack? Was the motivation to kill the old fella and take whatever they were after? Was the male coming back? Was he armed?
Had they made threats to kill him?
They invaded his home. They attacked him. They did this in a country that allows the use of deadly force to protect themselves.
What justified a home invasion?
What justified beating and attempting to disable an elderly man?
How do we know she was pregnant?
How do any of us know how we would react after a home invasion and beating with your body filled with adrenaline where one offender has left the house, maybe to get his own weapon and return?
He spent his life earning what he has got and nobody has any right to terrorise him in that way.
There is not enough respect for the elderly, or people in general.
Mercy is one of the few things you improve your life by giving it away.
Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.
Don't get me wrong. There is a reason my crow bar is where it is.
Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.
I dunno, do you? there is nothing in the article about imminent peril, sounds more like he just felt he had an excuse to do some killing he could get away with. Not to say the article is 100% accurate of course, but the ambiguity bears thinking about I would say. There are certainly case in which such a killing would be justifiable, just as there are certainly cases in which it would not; without more info to decide which is which I don't think an in-home beating/invasion justifies the death penalty.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Nothing.
Nothing.
Is it really relevant?
We don't, possibly why the article is worth reading and thinking about; I don't think I could ever get over killing someone while they begger for mercy no matter how well justified it as, could you?
Of course they don't. But just cos they didn't have the right to do what they did, doesn't mean they no longer have the right to live.
So, the solution to not enough respect is to just kill the disrespectful? Not sure I'm quite on board with such measures![]()
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks