
Originally Posted by
haydes55
I was told by an ex BP employee, the camera systems are minutes by a computer system which monitors most gas stations. If a vehicle has stolen gas, been reported stolen or the plates can't be read/scanned, an alarm goes off so the attendant knows to not activate the pump unless pre paid.
As for not being able to prove the theft, the vehicle contains stolen goods. Petrol is a good (good English). If a vehicle owner claims innocence, they could still be done for receiving stolen goods.
But gas stations have insurance, and they have accountants.
Was that NZ or UK (where they do have ANPR) as I don't think NZ servos have stumped up for the cost of ANPR systems judging by the crap quality of vid grabs on police facebook page.
The owner could not be done for receiving stolen goods. You would need to do an enormous amount of paperwork not to mention draining the tank and measuring to provide the appropriate evidence.
Although there has beena recent conviction in that area with that Fonterra driver I suspect the other guy confessed and they have txt messages etc detailing the amounts...
I'm not sure they would have insurance cover for such low level losses. The premium and excess charges/paperwork time would make it uneconomical for both sides.
Eg most truck companies have insurance for rollovers, big claim half million dollars of gear plus the freight, excess would likely be around 50000 I think. But drop a pallet of apples or booze off the forklift and think that just comes straight out of the companies profits.
You can get insurance for just about any event but theres a point where it becomes uneconomic.
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bookmarks