Gene pool

[bogan]

Look at that.

'Irrefutable' proof never used.

To be fair though, your ideas of words like evidence, absence, are a bit on the piss; so who knows what you are deeming.

[Katman]

To be fair though, your ideas of words like evidence, absence, are a bit on the piss; so who knows what you are deeming.

[FJRider]

To be fair though, your ideas of words like evidence, absence, are a bit on the piss; so who knows what you are deeming.

ENGLISH translation please .. ??

[husaberg]

Look at that.

'Irrefutable' proof never used.

Tell me about it I just at Katmans bequest read all his 911 conspiracy theories. While I should be doing something constructive.
The basic Katman theory basically consist of him denying anything that doesn't suit his theory while any of what he deems as a inconsistency in the official story is deemed to be irrefutable proof that his own theory is valid.
If anyone challenges his theory or points to any gaping holes in it. They are told to fuck up and they must be stupid for not agreeing with him.
Its a bloody interesting insight.

Pretty sure in your zealousness to refute your own short comings, you over looked the word deemed
Or is it you don't appreciate what it actually means?

Look at that.

'Irrefutable' proof never used.

deem
(dim)
v.t.
1. to hold as an opinion; think: I deemed it wise to refuse.
v.i.
2. Archaic. to form or have an opinion; believe; consider

Don't bother replying because you can't comprehend simple sentences either.
Which is kind of odd seeing you seem to be a little simple.
In fact, maybe you should keep posting the same old crap, as its irrefutable proof you are a bit simple

I think you're right, was reading the Boston bombing thread started by the fucking moron!

Oh I missed that one Who was responsible Israel or Jewish People or the Cia funded and acting for the Jewish people
Guess the cops didn't know what they were doing and should have stopped it Judges were brought or stupid and even if the guy confessed he could have been lying.
Did they find any traces of thermite or were that that stupid they didn't think to even look.
Is that close..............

[Katman]

I haven't 'deemed' anything to be 'irrefutable'.

I think you'll find Ed's the only one displaying that level of arrogance.

[scumdog]

I haven't deemed anything to be 'irrefutable'.

I believe Ed's the only one displaying that level of arrogance.

So you base your fantastic claims on vague generalisations instead of 'irrefutable' facts?

Good one Sherlock...

[Katman]

So you base your fantastic claims on vague generalisations instead of 'irrefutable' facts?

Good one Sherlock...

What 'irrefutable' facts?

[husaberg]

I haven't 'deemed' anything to be 'irrefutable'.

I think you'll find Ed's the only one displaying that level of arrogance.

Ed, there is absolutely no 'evidence' whatsoever that the WTC were not demolished with explosives.

On the other hand there is ample evidence supporting the claim that explosives were used.

You're just too blind and brainwashed to see it.

The only theory that I am willing to put my name to so far is that the US government (or factions within the government) was at the very least complicit in the events of 9/11.

So you base your fantastic claims on vague generalisations instead of 'irrefutable' facts?

Good one Sherlock...

Come on Scummy he has already said (and in his mind clearly established) you are no sort of Policemen seeing as you are not interested in his 9-11 "truths"
Are you for also forgetting he was stitched up for a speeding ticket, though even that he won't state whether he was speeding or not but he was clearly stitched up regardless.

[Katman]

Come on Scummy he has already said (and in his mind clearly established) you are no sort of Policemen seeing as you are not interested in his 9-11 "truths"
Are you for also forgetting he was stitched up for a speeding ticket, though even that he won't state whether he was speeding or not but he was clearly stitched up regardless.

Hush, you're embarrassing yourself again.

[FJRider]

So you base your fantastic claims on vague generalisations instead of 'irrefutable' facts?

Good one Sherlock...

This is KB ... get over it (him) ... you know where the IGNORE button is ..

[FJRider]

Hush, you're embarrassing yourself again.

Stop talking to yourself ...

[scumdog]

What 'irrefutable' facts?

Hmm, that seems to be a confirmation that you DO rely on vague generalisations for your arguments...

[husaberg]

Stop talking to yourself ...

Could you hear him The Transmission was poor
All I could make out was a metallic rustling noise.......

[Katman]

Hmm, that seems to be a confirmation that you DO rely on vague generalisations for your arguments...

I'll take that as "I don't have any 'irrefutable' facts".

[Gadget1]

Oh I missed that one Who was responsible Israel or Jewish People or the Cia funded and acting for the Jewish people
Guess the cops didn't know what they were doing and should have stopped it Judges were brought or stupid and even if the guy confessed he could have been lying.
Did they find any traces of thermite or were that that stupid they didn't think to even look.
Is that close..............

No way, you make it look a bit sensible. The fucking moron (TM) version was far worse than that.