The American (USA) 2016 presidential elections thread?

[bogan]

This is a pretty good summary of the 'pizzagate' and poor voter/media ethics/intelligence. Such behavior deserves nothing less than contempt, yet that state of the world is such that it must be given more than that, lest it spread through the unwitting and naive.

[yokel]

This is a pretty good summary of the 'pizzagate' and poor voter/media ethics/intelligence. Such behavior deserves nothing less than contempt, yet that state of the world is such that it must be given more than that, lest it spread through the unwitting and naive.

Yeah according to fake stream media "pizzagate" is fake news and Hillary is going to win the election.

Go on the dark web and order yourself a "cheese pizza"

Enjoy.

Trying to make satire news out of the subject of pedophilia is fucking bad taste.

That clown in that vid can go fuck himself.

[bogan]

Yeah according to fake stream media "pizzagate" is fake news and Hillary is going to win the election.

Go on the dark web and order yourself a "cheese pizza"

Enjoy.

Trying to make satire news out of the subject of pedophilia is fucking bad taste.

That clown in that vid can go fuck himself.

The satire is of the morons who believed the pizzagate nonsense.

The story has not one shred of evidence, yet fake-news/conpiracy-theorys/self-delusions, are now so prolific that people still believe it, and dismiss any line of questioning or investigation as 'Main Stream Media' lies. There once was a time when news 'streams' were judged by how accurate and informative their news was, not simply on whether or not is was what one wanted to hear; and that is what is in bad taste here, FSM adherents want to believe this child prostitution story.

[yokel]

The satire is of the morons who believed the pizzagate nonsense.

The story has not one shred of evidence, yet fake-news/conpiracy-theorys/self-delusions, are now so prolific that people still believe it, and dismiss any line of questioning or investigation as 'Main Stream Media' lies. There once was a time when news 'streams' were judged by how accurate and informative their news was, not simply on whether or not is was what one wanted to hear; and that is what is in bad taste here, FSM adherents want to believe this child prostitution story.

Tell me how that political pedophile inquiry in the UK is going?
You know that one that sent a NZ judge back home.

The MSM is totally discredited, so when they say it's fake news 50,000 Times then it must be true.

Just look at how Jimmy Savile was protected by the BBC.

[bogan]

Tell me how that political pedophile inquiry in the UK is going?
You know that one that sent a NZ judge back home.

The MSM is totally discredited, so when they say it's fake news 50,000 Times then it must be true.

Fucked if I know, I'm just not that in touch with the world of pedophilia.

Either way it is going, I don't think you understand how logic works. Just because a news source may be wrong at one time, does not mean it must always be wrong, and it certainly does not mean you use that source as a benchmark to determine what is wrong. And, MSM is not a news source, it is a grouping used to describe multiple sources, it is illogic to assume the bad traits of one or two carry to the whole group simply because you can group them together.

[Katman]

Fucked if I know, I'm just not that in touch with the world of pedophilia.

You seem awfully certain that nothing's going on though.

....it is illogic to assume the bad traits of one or two carry to the whole group simply because you can group them together.

And the same could be said about the 'alternative' news sites.

[bogan]

You seem awfully certain that nothing's going on though.



And the same could be said about the alternative 'news' site.

Ah, the fan club's following me around for some more contextual nitpickery and beige insults. Is this post going to get deleted as well? or will it last the distance...

Anyway, the thing about rational evaluation, is you don't have to jump to all the conclusions with no evidence (it's actually discouraged, FYI).

It's almost like no matter the site/stream/media, the story should be evaluated for it's accuracy.

[Katman]

Ah, the fan club's following me around for some more contextual nitpickery and beige insults.

Really? You saw an insult in my previous post?

If you did, you should probably report it.

I hear the moderators are cracking down on that sort of thing.

[yokel]

Fucked if I know, I'm just not that in touch with the world of pedophilia.

Either way it is going, I don't think you understand how logic works. Just because a news source may be wrong at one time, does not mean it must always be wrong, and it certainly does not mean you use that source as a benchmark to determine what is wrong. And, MSM is not a news source, it is a grouping used to describe multiple sources, it is illogic to assume the bad traits of one or two carry to the whole group simply because you can group them together.

So you don't know shit from clay.
You keep believing what Clinton shill tells you.

[bogan]

So you don't know shit from clay.
You keep believing what Clinton shill tells you.

I keep believing what the evidence (the actual verifiable stuff, not inflated misinterpreted circumstantial garbage as in those videos) points to; there is nothing pointing to such a prostitution ring. You have heard a conspiracy nutter went in there with a gun (blazing) to find evidence right? how did that turn out?

[yokel]

I keep believing what the evidence (the actual verifiable stuff, not inflated misinterpreted circumstantial garbage as in those videos) points to; there is nothing pointing to such a prostitution ring. You have heard a conspiracy nutter went in there with a gun (blazing) to find evidence right? how did that turn out?

I'm sure you 'd love to get your chops around this guys pizza?

[pritch]

I hear the moderators are cracking down on that sort of thing.

Not anywhere near hard enough though.

[Katman]

Either way it is going, I don't think you understand how logic works. Just because a news source may be wrong at one time, does not mean it must always be wrong, and it certainly does not mean you use that source as a benchmark to determine what is wrong. And, MSM is not a news source, it is a grouping used to describe multiple sources, it is illogic to assume the bad traits of one or two carry to the whole group simply because you can group them together.

So how do you reconcile the fact that the Pentagon paid over half a billion dollars to a British PR company to produce fake terror videos?

It's absolutely ludicrous that anyone could defend the allegations being made by TPTB of fake news, when they have been so blatantly exposed doing exactly that.

[bogan]

So how do you reconcile the fact that the Pentagon paid over half a billion dollars to a British PR company to produce fake terror videos?

It's absolutely ludicrous that anyone could defend the allegations being made by TPTB of fake news, when they have been so blatantly exposed doing exactly that.

Is that actually a fact, or fake news in itself? because it sure seems like the latter.

Hypocrisy of the source has no bearing on the validity of an allegation. Fake news is a problem, no matter the source.

[onearmedbandit]

Really? You saw an insult in my previous post?

If you did, you should probably report it.

I hear the moderators are cracking down on that sort of thing.

All good, we put it through analysis with our KB-Insultometer-dynamatron and it passed. Infraction guns set to stun.