Yes - you are right. This site makes that clear (the site I found it on was wrong)
This also shows how far the pollution has spread
https://climateviewer.com/2013/10/22...pacific-ocean/
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
I assumed that the inference of your post was likening those who saw everything as unconnected coincidences to the adults in your 'analogy', and likening those who saw them as a series of carefully choreographed events to the children who saw faces in clouds.
Feel free to correct me if that wasn't what you meant.
It's hilarious - you can see Patterns of global conspiracy, but you can't see an inferred reference to the Human ability for Pattern Recognition and its development from Children to Adults.
Maybe you'd understand if it was posted on one of your Conspiracy sites or in a Youtube Video....
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
I did say you were close, did I not - but then you missed the most important point - not only was I implying that most people grow out of this (which you got) - but also the deeper meaning about being wary of seeing patterns in randomised datapoints where no patterns may actually exist.
No - again, I thought this was obvious - since I neither referenced the video or made any mention of it.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Well you're wrong - again.
If your only intention was to point out the idea of seeing patterns in random occurrences there was no need for the bit about 'adults who laugh at them'.
The only reason for the inclusion of that bit was your inference that anyone who sees events as part of a carefully choreographed plan is to be likened to a child while those who see everything as a totally random series of coincidental events is likened to an adult.
Hence why I asked - have you watched the video?
The fact that you haven't watched it means you're still happy to present your arguments from a position of ignorance.
Well done you.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks