Adultery's not so bad after all...

[Coyote]

Sigh.

Does this mean your use of 'women' rather than 'woman' the first time around wasn't a subtle bit of intentional wordplay?

Think I would be so clever?

School's haven't really put much emphasis on spelling. The last thing I was taught how to spell was 'cat'.


Funnily enough, firefox spell check didn't pick up on it.

[jrandom]

Think I would be so clever?

Well, actually... yes.



Bugger.

I'm going to get mercilessly needled about this tomorrow.

Still, the original 'a women's' was quite clever, and quite funny. Pity it was unintentional.

[Coyote]

Still, the original 'a women's' was quite clever, and quite funny. Pity it was unintentional.

Many people find my ignorance humorous.

Still don't understand what's so funny about it. These things tend to hit me like a glacier. Best leave me to figure it out.

[Goblin]

Bugger.

Did anyone ever tell you how much you look like that pink cuddly, fuzzy pink bat in the pink bat commercial?

[jrandom]

Still don't understand what's so funny about it.

I told 007XX that one puts the possessive apostrophe before the 's' in words that don't need the 's' to make them plurals.

Like 'people'.

Also, like 'women' (the plural of 'woman').

So you responded with the phrase 'a women's', thereby applying my rule correctly, but chucking in an indefinite article to keep the syntax incorrect.

[Coyote]

I told 007XX that one puts the possessive apostrophe before the 's' in words that don't need the 's' to make them plurals.

Like 'people'.

Also, like 'women' (the plural of 'woman').

So you responded with the phrase 'a women's', thereby applying my rule correctly, but chucking in an indefinite article to keep the syntax incorrect.

I wouldn't have been able to come up with something like that unless I spent more time with my posts. As you can see with my post count, I don't.

Thanks for thinking so highly of me, but it wasn't to be this time.

[Trudes]

I'm being serious! I have not met a women that does not treat being corrected as though they've been told "I hate you, go and die".

Unless I'd rather them to go and die since I hate them, I'll never provoke a women in such a way.

Good thinking!!
If there has been one thing I have learned from spending time on KB it is to not take people disagreeing with me or correcting me, personally. If they make some kind of personal attack on me, I think that just shows that they are an arsehole for having to resort to personal attacks, especially if they don't actually know me.

I wouldn't have been able to come up with something like that unless I spent more time with my posts.

And with your head up your arse too probably, so thank goodness you don't!!

[merv]

And with your head up your arse too probably, so thank goodness you don't!!

That brings new meaning to any thoughts of anal .

[Coyote]

Good thinking!!
If there has been one thing I have learned from spending time on KB it is to not take people disagreeing with me or correcting me, personally. If they make some kind of personal attack on me, I think that just shows that they are an arsehole for having to resort to personal attacks, especially if they don't actually know me.

I've cottoned onto that as well. It's best not to take the bait with counter attacks, it only feeds the flames of abuse. Not that I believe jrandom would be abusive toward me. Don't think I deserve the honour quite yet.

And with your head up your arse too probably, so thank goodness you don't!!

My head has always been outside of my arse, and hasn't been near anyone elses. Except one person, though closer to the original topic I'll go no further...

[CookMySock]

[...] to not take people disagreeing with me or correcting me, personally.

I reckon. What amazes me is getting flamed or red-repped because someone disagrees. geez..

DB

[Trudes]

I reckon. What amazes me is getting flamed or red-repped because someone disagrees. geez..

DB

haha, and what's really funny is those people are usually the first ones to start yelling about everyone being entitled to an opinion.

[sinfull]

It doesn't generally matter where you get your appetite, just as long as you eat at home! John.

Nearly as good as *just because i'm on a diet, does not mean i wont look at the menu*!

[007XX]

nooo, little timmy loved it - wants more !
DB

You're disturbing, and yet fairly lovable...nice mix!

ewww Shrek has a warty cock! Princess Fiona & Donkey are in for some kind of itching burning treat me thinks

Don't blame me...Shrek Lone Rider wanted to see it.

I never realised that Fiona was such a slutty cocksucker!! No wonder those other princesses had it in for her, she was probably fucking their mice or dwarfs.

Eh, it is calledbeing liberated and open minded with a general enjoyment of many opportunities being taken...

Bah, who am i kiddin'? She does look like she'd be a bit of a slut eh?

I'm being serious! I have not met a women that does not treat being corrected as though they've been told "I hate you, go and die".
Unless I'd rather them to go and die since I hate them, I'll never provoke a women in such a way.

Well, before my overly clever friend Jrandom interjected on my thoughts upon the matter, I had a nice reply brewed up for you, along the lines of:

Just as we had mentioned earlier on in the thread, often the origin of human relational difficulties can be traced to insecurities...so, I potentially should be reacting to Jrandom's correction in an aggressive manner if I felt at all insecure about my capabilitie to use correctly the english grammar, but I don't.

I am quite honnestly happy about Jr correcting me as I see it as constructive criticism and it helps me better my english. And yes, as one of my closest friends, he is fully aware of this.

It doesn't generally matter where you get your appetite, just as long as you eat at home! John.

yes, and you and I have always agreed on this one...As far as I'm concerned, you're one of the last cowboys John: a true gentleman. Pip is a lucky lady!

[007XX]

Sigh.

Does this mean your use of 'women' rather than 'woman' the first time around wasn't a subtle bit of intentional wordplay?

Told ya...

Well, actually... yes.



Bugger.

I'm going to get mercilessly needled about this tomorrow.

Ya think?????

I told 007XX that one puts the possessive apostrophe before the 's' in words that don't need the 's' to make them plurals.

Like 'people'.

Also, like 'women' (the plural of 'woman').

So you responded with the phrase 'a women's', thereby applying my rule correctly, but chucking in an indefinite article to keep the syntax incorrect.

And...once again: I told you so... Oh how I am enjoying this. Cheap win, but who gives a hoot???

Thanks for thinking so highly of me, but it wasn't to be this time.

Ok, that's enough of that you...unless you want me to come over and spank you personally...
Seriously though, you are way more clever than you give yourself credit for, so stop belittling yourself.

[Coyote]

Well, before my overly clever friend Jrandom interjected on my thoughts upon the matter, I had a nice reply brewed up for you, along the lines of:

Just as we had mentioned earlier on in the thread, often the origin of human relational difficulties can be traced to insecurities...so, I potentially should be reacting to Jrandom's correction in an aggressive manner if I felt at all insecure about my capabilitie to use correctly the english grammar, but I don't.

I am quite honnestly happy about Jr correcting me as I see it as constructive criticism and it helps me better my english. And yes, as one of my closest friends, he is fully aware of this.

Yeah, but you're weird.

Ok, that's enough of that you...unless you want me to come over and spank you personally...
Seriously though, you are way more clever than you give yourself credit for, so stop belittling yourself.

Is that supposed to deter me?

I don't want to seem arrogant so I never talk highly of myself unless I'm joking or if I'm really just that awesome. Which I am.

Yes, as above, when all affected parties know and are willing.

Is it still adultery if all those involved, physically or emotionally, are aware and ok with the act?