I bought an SV put an aftermarket gel seat on her nice and comfy now. You could also throw in a Buell for that matter. When I was looking you could get an XB9r for around $8500.00.
![]()
I bought an SV put an aftermarket gel seat on her nice and comfy now. You could also throw in a Buell for that matter. When I was looking you could get an XB9r for around $8500.00.
![]()
"No matter what bike you ride. It's all the same wind in your face"
Now I see some people here a rabid TL1000 fans and I'm sure it is a fast bike, but after checking one out for sale at AFC motorcycles it has too much of a racing position while the SV have a better riding positon and I aint after top speed.
As a well-spent day brings happy sleep, so life well used brings happy death
Γύρος στη νίκη
I got a SV a few months back. The new price is hard to beat.
Replacing the bars with the higher ones from F1 Engineering in Hamilton made a huge difference for comfort.
The seat is firm and (some say) a bit narrow towards the front. I thought it was Ok. THere are gel seats on eaby for them.
Have a look on the sv-portal.com board
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) Peace through superior firepower...
Build your own dyno - PM me for the link of if you want to use it (bring beer)
Agree with the Honda vs Suzuki 1000twins,they are a different feel,the honda to me felt cramped,the suzuki felt good,and if ya chuck a pillion on she wanted the sv as she felt it was a better pillion position.
Also I was looking at them new at $12000 but non available to try,was offered a vtr to try,but not the same,sure the power etc similar,but we wanted to try comfort wise and for us they were different,even just sitting on them,let alone buying one and finding after a 200km ride it isn't what I(we) wanted due to position,pretty sure the consumers guarantee act states if you change your mind the shop doesn't have to refund,and that could be where it could get sticky.
Hello officer put it on my tab
Don't steal the government hates competition.
Have a look a a Tuono then... same engine as the RSV (albeit about 2 years behind i.e. 2006 > Tuono has 2004 > RSV)... have always been tempted to try one out... but just don't get on with the looks...
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Its the sound and the torque and the narrow motor and the lower engine gyroscopic effects on handling and the better rear end traction and and and ....
And get a 90degree L twin instead of V twin. The L twin is the most naturally balanced configuration...
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
Naturally balanced is not smooth as you know, naturally balance means no need for counter balance shafts and minimal crankshaft balancing....less critical vibes
V Twins ..... are ..... Booooootyfullll !!!!!![]()
.... and I came off a CB900 ..... to get one !!! Literally !!! lol
![]()
![]()
Yep - I must say that I too found the SVs a uncomfortable beast - the bars are too low, seat high and slanted forward. It did not suit my physics at all. The rarer naked version was a lot better.
I still think the rounder lines of the TL and earlier SV650 are more pleasing.
Nope never owned a tewin in my life,bevel drive ducs (read as real Ducatis) a couple of later models (both pieces of characterless shit) but ney never a tewin.Possibly thats why ive missed out on this late model D fondess you lot speak of..note to self next time i am looking for a real one get a tewin.![]()
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
Yes mate, got that, fat fingers, small keys and rushed typing a tewin make...
Sorry to disapoint with my lack of a real bike, happy with the TL?, just bought an SV 650 K9 for the daughter, I think she will be happy with it.
BTW the pat on the back was for 90 degree twins in general...take a bow
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks