No it isn't. As I previously pointed out there have been at least as many Women in the same positions of power who have behaved as required in any given situation. You're letting the last 40 years worth of feminist rhetoric blind you to the bulk of human existence having a matriarchal flavour in regard to political power.
There's a curious undertone to your message that you think that men have had more choice in the course of their lives than women. "Men" have only had the vote for approx. 50 years more than women in British society. The vast majority of every political system in Europe was the same. Prior to the Industrial revolution men and women were equal legal entities with every Western political system you can think of. They were little better than serfs and owning and running a business did nothing to elevate you within society. Even now a small number of people own all the land in the UK.
YOu have war to thank for the reversal of the social expectations created by the deconstruction of a way of life to fuel first an Industrial Revolution and then an attempt to colonise the planet. Without WWII's demand for "manpower", womanpower would have remained a secret.
Elizabeth I created the paradigm that lead to the modern world. A chick. Queen Isabel of Spain created a model for a vicious, vindictive, female ruler when she expelled the Moors, Jews, and Celts from Spain and ruthlessly started exterminating Basques.
Women are just as good as men at war, genocide, and despotism. Just because a woman does it, doesn't make it a righteous feminist activity.
Modern Post-Feminist/4th wave Feminist society is starting to approach the gender equity that existed in pre-industrial times. Both genders through a combination of debt burden and a stulifying cost of living have to slave day and night to stay on the game, let alone ahead of it. Just like the old days.
It's outrageous to assume that all history is dominated by male atrocity. That's rhetoric without substance. Certainly the last 200 years have been weird, but they are not representative of history as a whole, just western European history, especially in regard to political systems born during that period. How could they not reflect social mores though?
Bookmarks