View Poll Results: Of the two options for a National Stadium which do you prefer

Voters
152. You may not vote on this poll
  • Water Front

    37 24.34%
  • Eden Park

    50 32.89%
  • Neither as rugby is boring

    65 42.76%
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 127

Thread: Rugby Stadium

  1. #16
    Join Date
    3rd September 2005 - 08:19
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    3,712
    so which one do Beca stand to make more coin from then?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    23rd February 2006 - 14:28
    Bike
    Kwakasaurus Z750s '05
    Location
    Crime central.
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Beemer View Post
    I hate rugby and it's in Auckland so who cares?
    Who cares?:
    • Those who like rugby
    • Those who live in auckland
    • Those who have consideration for fellow NZ'ers regardless of where they live
    • Those who are interested in where their hard earned tax money goes
    • Those who are able to grasp the wider reaching economic, social and political effects of this on the whole country

  3. #18
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 13:36
    Bike
    '69 Lambretta & SR400
    Location
    By the other harbour.
    Posts
    707
    Why do we have to have the "national stadium" in Auckland anyway, send it to Hamilton with the V8 and the rally we don't want anything remotely connected with fun up here.

    No to the waterfront anyway because:
    1) It's bloody Mallard's ego-trip
    2) It'll ruin the view of the city
    3) It'll ruin the view from the city
    4) There's nowhere to park
    5) It's near Britomart, but so what, about four trains run in and olut of there per day
    6) It'll cost a Billion friggin dollars, to host one rugby match?
    7) Concerts in stadiums suck.
    8) If we have to build new stick it somewhere handy to Mways and the airport.....bulldoze Otahuhu!
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Lobster View Post
    Only a homo puts an engine back together WITHOUT making it go faster.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Build the damn thing wherever they like - with one proviso.

    ALL the money comes from the rugby profession, sponsorship or any other means rather than the public purse.
    The waterfront stadium will blow out of budget projections, by massive proportions! Who will be left to pay the bill for this gubbinment's "monument to themself"... the taxpayer.


    Also, regarding the colour of the damn thing, what will happen when the first fog occurs and a containership rams into it?????

    Edit: Spend the money on fixing up the traffic/roading problems around the country and providing a decent rail service!!!
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  5. #20
    Join Date
    3rd September 2005 - 08:19
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    3,712
    Let's hope they get a better project manager and QS than the Vector Arena did......

  6. #21
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Dover View Post
    Let's hope they get a better project manager and QS than the Vector Arena did......
    You neglected the Aotea Centre from that list.......
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  7. #22
    Join Date
    3rd September 2005 - 08:19
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    3,712
    before my time so I have no grounds for comment.

    I hear there's a firm in the UK that did quite a good job on the national stadium.

    They should be available top start in a year or so....

  8. #23
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    2006 BMW F800ST
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    4,916
    It doesn't matter where they put it - no one will go - New Zealanders seem naturally apathetic when it comes to spectator sports preferring in their masses to watch it on telly with a few tinnies and a pizza.

    It takes a city like Glasgow to sustain 3 55,000+ stadiums with a population of only 1,000,000!

    As I've ssaid before though - with sea levels rising it'll make a great aquapark by 2011!
    In space, no one can smell your fart.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    8th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    GSXR 750 the wanton hussy
    Location
    Not in Napier now
    Posts
    12,765
    Quote Originally Posted by Squeak the Rat View Post
    Who cares?:
    • Those who like rugby
    • Those who live in auckland
    • Those who have consideration for fellow NZ'ers regardless of where they live
    • Those who are interested in where their hard earned tax money goes
    • Those who are able to grasp the wider reaching economic, social and political effects of this on the whole country
    Good points. But I can't be arsed with rugby, so I'm not swayed.
    As long as this doesn't turn into another "Auckland is the powerhouse of NZ, so the rest of you can pay for it" situation.
    Build it if you must, anywhere you like, for as much $ as necessary. But don't expect the country as a whole to support paying for it. We don't all like rugby/see any other need for such an arena.
    Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    2nd April 2005 - 11:58
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    5,095
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Dover View Post
    so which one do Beca stand to make more coin from then?
    Trevor doesn't want any money made from this project.
    They shall not grow old as we that are left grow old.
    Age shall not weary them nor the years condemn.
    At the going down of the sun and in the evening,
    we will remember them

  11. #26
    Join Date
    21st March 2006 - 14:22
    Bike
    all sorts
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by McJim View Post
    As I've ssaid before though - with sea levels rising it'll make a great aquapark by 2011!
    and everyone will believe that when there is actually some proof .....
    He who makes a beast out of himself
    Gets rid of the pain of being a man

  12. #27
    Join Date
    9th November 2006 - 18:42
    Bike
    Ducati V4S Streetfighter
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,120
    Blog Entries
    1
    ...... nice, a half billion dollar fish bowl.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    18th December 2004 - 08:09
    Bike
    Triumph Tiger
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,086
    I reckon Carlaw Park is the best option, already has all the links for transport, parking, and isn't going to need stabilising before any work starts and the port doesn't need moving.
    Owners have already agreed to in principle, extra land available and no 2 year delay get started.
    Eden park is already messed up enough why make it worse, Downtown is just silly and hideously expensive, the Government says if not Auckland then Jade stadium is the next obvious choice. I say if you're not going to do it right in Auckland then by all means do it in Christchurch.

    "If you can't laugh at yourself, you're just not paying attention!"
    "There is no limit to dumb."

    "Resolve to live with all your might while you do live, and as you shall wish you had done ten thousand years hence."

  14. #29
    Join Date
    9th November 2006 - 18:42
    Bike
    Ducati V4S Streetfighter
    Location
    Orewa, Auckland
    Posts
    4,120
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Whynot View Post
    and everyone will believe that when there is actually some proof .....
    Apparently the beaches are far smaller than they used to be (like compared to what they were 100 years ago).... indicating the water levels are slowly rising - either that, or the sand is just getting washed away and that just ain't newsworthy (or taxable, like emissions taxes to reduce CO2 output blah blah excuses excuses).

  15. #30
    Join Date
    21st March 2006 - 14:22
    Bike
    all sorts
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Toaster View Post
    Apparently the beaches are far smaller than they used to be (like compared to what they were 100 years ago).... indicating the water levels are slowly rising - either that, or the sand is just getting washed away and that just ain't newsworthy (or taxable, like emissions taxes to reduce CO2 output blah blah excuses excuses).
    like i said .... when there is actually some proof.
    He who makes a beast out of himself
    Gets rid of the pain of being a man

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •