Instilling a sense of conscience.

**boomer** · 22nd July 2009, 17:56

Originally Posted by short-circuit

Having read the last four pages I noticed that Shrub did say he did a quick over shoulder check and he also mentioned checking his blindspot (as a former truckie). The point he was making about checking helmets was that he was at the front leading a group ride. So the rider of the gixxer approaching with excessive speed may or may not have been one of a number of helmets.

I think he was making a perfectly valid point which was exactly as I observed back in post #29....

Please explain why you red repped me for that post sixpackjack(off) (post#29 that is) - Was that just hardcore Gixxer loyality or were you the grade A pillock in question?

im gonna red rep you cos its thursday.. ok

**short-circuit** · 22nd July 2009, 18:00

Originally Posted by boomer

im gonna red rep you cos its thursday.. ok

Ooh that really hurt

You sure it's not coz you enjoy the snug warmness of sixpack's back cavity?

**short-circuit** · 22nd July 2009, 18:02

Originally Posted by boomer

im gonna red rep you cos its thursday.. ok

(in the absence of any counter-argument)

**boomer** · 22nd July 2009, 18:03

Originally Posted by short-circuit

Ooh that really hurt

You sure it's not coz you enjoy the snug warmness of sixpack's back cavity?

I love having anal sex with him, hes warm cuddly and gives reach arounds.

I understand you do teh same in teh triple club..

**short-circuit** · 22nd July 2009, 18:05

Originally Posted by boomer

I understand you do teh same in teh triple club..

Try DB's swingers club

**Katman** · 22nd July 2009, 18:05

Originally Posted by boomer

If i were near you.. you'd be gone burger.. no second thoughts. Does that answer ya question?

**The Stranger:Me** · 22nd July 2009, 18:05

Originally Posted by short-circuit

Having read the last four pages I noticed that Shrub did say he did a quick over shoulder check and he also mentioned checking his blindspot (as a former truckie). The point he was making about checking helmets was that he was at the front leading a group ride. So the rider of the gixxer approaching with excessive speed may or may not have been one of a number of helmets.

I think he was making a perfectly valid point which was exactly as I observed back in post #29....

"so I would have glanced to my right when I started to indicate"
That is not saying he did. In fact it took him 13 pages and many posts on the topic for his memory to return.

Plus comments such as this "One day you should ride a bike and try turning your head and looking over your shoulder and see how many bikes you can count before you fall off." indicate that he is clearly inept at head checks.

**boomer** · 22nd July 2009, 18:07

Originally Posted by The Stranger

One day you should ride a bike and try turning your head and looking over your shoulder and see how many bikes you can count before you fall off

pretty much a give away

**boomer** · 22nd July 2009, 18:07

Originally Posted by Katman

is that the best u can do?

**The Stranger:Me** · 22nd July 2009, 18:08

Originally Posted by MarkH

Well, from what I gathered from reading his posts he was saying that the gixxer was in the same lane as him coming up past other bikes and then moved out across the centre line and passed him as he was moving out across the centre line to pass the car.

How the hell do you gather that? The only eye witness claims he didn't see him, so were you there? If not, I think we should rely upon the only witness account - shrub.

**short-circuit** · 22nd July 2009, 18:11

Originally Posted by The Stranger

"so I would have glanced to my right when I started to indicate"

That's right - he claims he did...that's all anyone's got to go on.

A bit of a red herring though when the point he was making was that some twat him at 50-60km above the speed limit through/round a group of riders

**The Stranger:Me** · 22nd July 2009, 18:18

Originally Posted by short-circuit

That's right - he claims he did...that's all anyone's got to go on.

Ah no, first he claims he didn't then he claims he can't.
Would have means he would have if he could have, not that he did.

**caseye** · 22nd July 2009, 18:21

Was probably a chocolate one! hate chocolate ones, Bananna now theres a cake!Sorry got sidetracked there for a minute.
The GX'er rider should have his sword broke over his head and be demoted to riding scooters for the rest of his natural.

**short-circuit** · 22nd July 2009, 18:32

Originally Posted by The Stranger

Ah no, first he claims he didn't then he claims he can't.
Would have means he would have if he could have, not that he did.

To me it implies that upon recollection that's what he "would" have done as a matter of course. In addition, in his initial post he said that as well as a mirror check, he checked his blind spot.

But once again, the main issue (which is being persistently fudged) was the behaviour of the Gixxer rider - which a shoulder check wouldn't necessarily pick up either when riding as part of a group.