Urrrr... how often you supposed to get those auto thingies serviced ...
my wifes car has one, I don't drive it and it has too many wheels for me to consider doing any maintinence on it, 6 wheels is far too many... confusing
Urrrr... how often you supposed to get those auto thingies serviced ...
my wifes car has one, I don't drive it and it has too many wheels for me to consider doing any maintinence on it, 6 wheels is far too many... confusing
Motorbike only search
YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - CRC AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE CRC. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE
Having had a tip-tronic car, all I can say is they had better improve the responsiveness of it.
Flick up - wait - change. Flick down - wait - change down.
How the ferk do match the throttle with that?!![]()
well well well....
Looks interesting...
from what I gather the more you open the throttle the faster it goes
Google: Hondamatic
Motorbike only search
YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - CRC AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE CRC. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE
There's theory, and then there's practice. In practice it just gets much, much louder.Originally Posted by XP@
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
That was first done in the 50s with the ''Standrive'' fitted to the Standard 10,a button on the floor shift.They were also fitted to the Series II Oxford,but can't remember what name they dreamed up,the Oxford was column change.Apprentices could give extreme abuse to these vehicles by reving the shit out of them with the button down,then releasing it...Originally Posted by Hitcher
CVTs are crap,horrible things to drive,very snatchy on stop start traffic,although I was told by Honda they are adaptive to drivers,dunno how that works.Triptronics are shit,they are starting to give trouble,and are so delayed in manual shift I don't even bother trying.BMC had the best auto box - a stick on the floor with 1,2,3,4 & D,you could just pull the lever through to shift to any gear instantly - now why can't they do that 30 yrs later? That's technology eh?
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
You can get your normal garage to do it, use a specialist garage like Hutt Automatics, or find out how to do it from a service manual. The transmissions need the fluid (hydraulic fluid essentially) changed about as regularly as your engine oil is. Some trannies need to be pressurised to bleed all the old fluid out.Originally Posted by XP@
If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?
Apprentices do something like that ? Naah never, I never knew an apprentice that would abuse a vehicle.Originally Posted by Motu
![]()
Actually Austin had a similar thing on a few of their vehicles in the '30's. And then of course there was the Daimler fluid flywheel and Wilson preselector box. Which was actually rather nice.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There's nothing new under the sun eh? One consolation in being an old fart - when the young fullas are showing off their lastest gizzmo,we can say...''yeah,I had one just like that,30 yrs ago!''Originally Posted by Ixion
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
Yep. Like belt drives. Latest thing eh ? Sure was, 100 years ago!.Originally Posted by Motu
4 valve heads are another one. Ever hear of the Rudge Ulster chaps.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Whats the point in that?
I do want a blade but if an auto was all that was on offer then I would not bother...
Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.
I dont like Autos except behind turbos where they can help keep the engine on boost.
Now imagine an Auto Turbo Hyabusa.... woohoo
I was just asking!
--- Autozam Wholesalewrote:
> From: "Autozam Wholesale"
> To: "James"
> Subject: Re: AUTOBASE: 1992 Honda CBR Registration AUT1017-MC17
> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:40:10 +1200
>
> wanker !
> Autozam Wholesale Ltd
> ph: 09 526 1558
> fax: 09 526 1485
> freephone: 0800 288 692
> www.autozam.co.nz
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James
> To: autozam@ihug.co.nz
> Cc: info@autobase.co.nz
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:56 PM
> Subject: AUTOBASE: 1992 Honda CBR Registration AUT1017-MC17
>
>
>
>
> The following is a message that has been sent to you through
> the AutoBase web site...
>
> From: James [jamesjriley@yahoo.com].
> To reply click HERE
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: AUTOBASE: 1992 Honda CBR Registration
> AUT1017-MC17
> Message: Hi, Could you please tell me if the automatic
> transmission was factory fitted? Would I be correct in assuming that
> the "Hondamatic" drive has been fitted? I would also like to see a
> photo of the final drive.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you have any questions about this message, please do not
> hesitate to call us on (09) 307 7185.
Motorbike only search
YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - CRC AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE CRC. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE
I owned an "automatic" Guzzi for a while - a Convert. Wasn't an auto. Had a torque convertor in place of the dry clutch you normally find on the back of a Guzzi motor. Two-speed manual gearbox, with a wet multi-plate clutch you were supposed to use when changing between high and low (but with the convertor slip the plates tended to stick so it didn't usually do much).
I'm pretty sure the various sizes (750, 400, 250?) "AT" Hondas of the mid seventies were a similar setup.
I enjoyed owning and riding the thing, but not because the transmission setup was in any way a good idea. More to savour the perversity that it existed at all. It would set off from rest in "high" and eventually reach 99mph. But the same could be said of a VFR750 in 3rd gear without the eventually...
Hey, the parking brake operated by the sidestand was pretty cool (couldn't leave the thing in gear when you parked it on a hill).
Originally Posted by AndyH
I think the 750 was not an AT . I've heard that it had a proper two speed auto, courtesy of GM (? which seems odd I admit). AFAIK it was only sold in the US market, any in NZ are imports from US.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Originally Posted by AndyH
I think the 750 was not an AT . I've heard that it had a proper two speed auto, courtesy of GM (? which seems odd I admit). AFAIK it was only sold in the US market, any in NZ are imports from US.
[googles like mad]
Seems it was the Hondamatic
from HereHowever, not all of Honda's innovations gained widespread acceptance. Hondamatic(TM)--a torque-converter-based automatic transmission for motorcycles--was a successful technology that didn't catch the public's fancy. Electric starting had brought a lot of people to motorcycling, and Honda wondered: Would an automatic do the same? The 1976 CB750 Automatic and 1977 CB400A were remarkable machines, but riders chose high-performance over this convenience. Honda also launched two other wildly diverse products in 1977--the NC50 no-ped, an ultralight, minimalist motorbike, and the FL250 Odyssey(R) four-wheeler, a natural evolution of the ATC90.
And a photo of one is Here
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks