Why do some bikes use chains and some use belts?
It is just a price thing, or do they both have advantages?
Why do some bikes use chains and some use belts?
It is just a price thing, or do they both have advantages?
Gahh! Thud.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
See Robert Taylor for any Ohlins requirements www.northwest.co.nzThanks Colemans SuzukiThanks AMCCI use DID Chains and Akrapovic Exhausts
See Robert Taylor for any Ohlins requirements www.northwest.co.nzThanks Colemans SuzukiThanks AMCCI use DID Chains and Akrapovic Exhausts
I didn't even realise they made two wheel bikes with an actual drive shaft, or is someone taking the micky?
Scotty? Please beam me up. Now.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
You can't chrome a chain and wear it on your jacket.It's called a soft option...but they are suitable for dentures.
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
not mine but seeing you asked.
belt drives are meant to be smoother in the power delivery and quieter.
cains wear and throw crap all over the place
shafties just keep on doing it with LITTLE TO NO MAINTENANCE
To be old and wise, first you must be young and stupid.
Most manufacturers offer shaft drive vehicles currently and most offer belt or chain driven alternatives too.
Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Shafts are the easiest to live with and heaviest and clunky-ist.
Chains are strong and messy and have differing service intervals.
Belts are clean and smooth and light and wear longer - but are much less resilient.
See Robert Taylor for any Ohlins requirements www.northwest.co.nzThanks Colemans SuzukiThanks AMCCI use DID Chains and Akrapovic Exhausts
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks