http://www.odt.co.nz/news/politics/7...-acc-criminals
Today Dr Smith said one of the areas that the Government was looking at cutting out was ACC lump sum and income compensation payments to those hurt when committing criminal acts.
The changes would not cut ACC paying for the treatment of people no matter how stupid or illegal their actions.
Fair enough. If you earn $100k a week as a criminal, and get hurt - I don't want ACC subsidising that income!
I am pretty sure that speeding is covered under the "summary offences act", that does make it a crime (obvioulsly), but as the very fact that it is covered under the act, it is not exactly seen as murder.
I would suspect that simply "exceeding the posted speed limit" would not negate your ACC cover....however "dangerous driving" may well do.
I think that it would be simple to say 'no ACC if convicted for any purely Indictable offence, or triable summarily offence'. This would alleviate the quandary of the doctor/surgeon/EMS after the initial injury, but would preclude long-term rehab and benefit costs.
these offences: (won't open in Firefox I have discovered) http://www.legislation.co.nz/act/pub...mary_resel&p=1
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks