Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 58

Thread: Radar detecter alternatives. Techie input needed

  1. #31
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Gremlin
    ..

    how much space is there on a bike?? Soon you might need a sidecar for the tech...
    Heaps of space on a BMW!. Might just have to move the microwave over a bit closer to the fridge. Or mount the TV a bit higher .
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  2. #32
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,499
    Blog Entries
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion
    Heaps of space on a BMW!. Might just have to move the microwave over a bit closer to the fridge. Or mount the TV a bit higher .
    So your bike goes slow enough to watch a bit of telly then??

    The microwave must make the winter-commute-while-having-breakfast comfy
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    30th March 2005 - 18:43
    Bike
    1997 Honda Blackbird
    Location
    Irchester. UK.
    Posts
    39
    Originally posted by Biff Baff.
    A bloke down the pub told me that many of the nations police coughiffers may or may not be slowly migrating over to a new radio system soon.
    This has already happened in Northants, UK. They are supposed to be un-scanable. It works on a similar system to mobile phones, I think. In fact the handset is quite like a mobile with extra features on it.
    'Vision without action is merely a dream.
    Action without vision just passes the time.
    Vision with action can change the world.'

  4. #34
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 16:16
    Bike
    18 Street Triple RS, 18 Aprilia Tuono RR
    Location
    Kawerau, NZ
    Posts
    799
    I see on one of the American radar sights that sells the Blinder Scrambler etc that they are developing a KA band jammer.....be interesting to see if it works....however it may just create more problems if caught with one!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Krusti
    I see on one of the American radar sights that sells the Blinder Scrambler etc that they are developing a KA band jammer.....be interesting to see if it works....however it may just create more problems if caught with one!
    There's two possibilties with jammers;
    1/ It transmits a freq corresponding to a certain speed. In NZ it would have to be 50 km/h, or even less if you include temp speed zones. Now not all cops are dumb enough to think a reading of 30 km/h on the m/way is not suspicious.
    2/ The better way is to transmit a freq that shows either no speed or something impossible like 400 k's, then shut off after a few seconds. By then you've slowed and if he zaps you again, you're legal.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    23rd November 2003 - 21:16
    Bike
    big red one, rgv's, kdx's
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    690
    How about paying some guys on bikes to follow the traffic cops, and have them carry a tracking system that riders can pick up on with a special tranciever (that you rent out with a monthy fee). This is not a system to encourage speeding, but to know where local police are in case you need to ask directions. That way we would all feel more safe.

    How hard would it be to stealth up a bike? make it like a b2 bomber.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy
    Also there's going to be on another problem. Once you reach those sorts of speeds you have to take into the account a quite severe doppler effect. .
    What speeds you talkin' 'bout? Relativistic? You have FTL drive on bike?
    Do you find time dilation a problem?
    "I went out for a ride .When I got home the Apes had taken over Earth!"
    Don't think you'll have a problem with doppler effect ,red shift,blue shift etc on a terrestrial vehicle .

  8. #38
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion
    Interesting thought. Given that it's really only a handful that we (oops, a hypothetical group of people, NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYONE HERE) have problems with.

    Transponders is cheap. So it's just a matter of figuring out how to attach them. Not sure that it would be breaking any law. After all, none of us have any reason to avoid Mr Plod .
    If you are going to the trouble of attaching transponders to cop cars-stick some composition 4 to the while you are at it.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    12th November 2004 - 09:11
    Bike
    2008 Kettweisel Style.
    Location
    on my arse
    Posts
    3,623

    Arrow Alternative???

    Yea, like don't speed at all...
    Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    1st February 2004 - 18:17
    Bike
    RC36, WR, RS250, GSXR1000, Duke250, IZH
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    632
    I heard a rumour that the motion detectors from house alarm systems could be rigged up as radar jammers?

  11. #41
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    They use infra red units as laser jammers in the UK. Don't know how effective they are.
    RF units wouldn't work as jammers.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    5th April 2005 - 12:57
    Bike
    In between bikes
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    799
    Quote Originally Posted by loosebruce
    Alternative to all techy gadgets - 6th gear!! Fifth on some bikes. Not that i ever would dream of doing such a thing.
    sixth at 50km/h ... engine ticking over slowly at about 4000rpm.
    Or
    sixth at 100km/h ... engine ticking over happily at about 8500rpm.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    12th November 2004 - 09:11
    Bike
    2008 Kettweisel Style.
    Location
    on my arse
    Posts
    3,623

    Arrow Yawn....

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyingpony
    sixth at 50km/h ... engine ticking over slowly at about 4000rpm.
    Or
    sixth at 100km/h ... engine ticking over happily at about 8500rpm.
    3rd at 50km/h...engine ticking over happily at about 8500rpm. If you can't do that then your a moron(PT)
    Those who insist on perfect safety, don't have the balls to live in the real world.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    20th February 2005 - 07:04
    Bike
    2010 Thruxton & 2013 Think Ion
    Location
    Tawa
    Posts
    1,180
    Blog Entries
    1
    Doppler effect would be no issue at all. Bear in mind that radar waves travel 1 radar mile at 12.36 micro seconds, and radar waves are radio waves. Therefore you would probably need to pull about 5000km per before you'll need to incorporate a doppler adjustment.
    I highly doubt that a police frequency receiver would be of any use. Quite simply, Police do not transmit frequently on their radios and if you are considering detecting a vehicle which is listening to police frequencies, it can't be done. Simply because those frequencies you are trying to detect are infact all around you already. A police vehicle will recieve these signals but will not emit any signal of strength that will give a detectable signature. You can definately detect a transmitting vehicle but who would be bothered as that is so infrequent. Your Radar Detector beats these options hands down. Personally, I find Radar Detectors so useless that I just wouldn't bother with them at all. There is only one way to beat Radar - JAMMERS!!!!!!! But they're illegal in NZ as you must be licensed to transmit and also transmissions on police frequencies are highly illegal.

    What I do know, Is that Police find it quite abit harder to lock up a motorbike.
    How would RAM paint perform on a motorcycle???? (Radar Absorbant Material).

  15. #45
    Join Date
    10th February 2005 - 21:49
    Bike
    06 10 WITH ALL THE FANCY BITS
    Location
    ON THE APEX/BETWEEN CARS
    Posts
    1,765

    Post Radar jamming basics....

    Found the anarchist cookbook 2000... a little bit of info here (not much help though )...

    Radar jamming by The Jolly Roger.

    Most drivers wanting to make better time on the open road will invest in one of those expensive radar detectors. However, this device will not work against a gun type radar unit in which the radar signal is not present until the cop has your car in his sights and pulls the trigger. Then it is TOO LATE for you to slow down. A better method is to continuously jam any signal with a radar signal of your own. I have tested this idea with the cooperation of a local cop and found that his unit reads random numbers when my car approached him. It is suprisingly easy to make a low power radar transmitter. A nifty little semiconductor called a Gunn Diode will generate microwaves when supplied with the 5 to 10 volt DC and enclosed in the correct size cavity (resonator). An 8 to 3 terminal regulator can be used to get this voltage from a car's 12v system. However, the correct construction and tuning of the cavity is difficult without good microwave measurement equipment. Police radars commonly operate on the K band at 22 GHz. Or more often on the X band at 10«25 GHz. most microwave intruder alarms and motion detectors (mounted over automatic doors in supermarkets & banks, etc.) contain a Gunn type transmitter/receiver combination that transmits about 10 kilowatts at 10«25 GHz. These units work perfectly as jammers. If you cannot get one locally, write to Microwave Associates in Burlington, Massachusetts and ask them for info on 'Gunnplexers' for ham radio use. When you get the unit it may be mounted in a plastic box on the dash or in a weather-proof enclosure behind the PLASTIC grille. Switch on the power when on an open highway. The unit will not jam radar to the side or behind the car so don't go speeding past the radar trap. An interesting phenomena you will notice is that the drivers who are in front of you who are using detectors will hit their brakes as you approach large metal signs and bridges. Your signal is bouncing off of these objects and triggering their radar detectors!

    Seems the reference to K and X bands makes it a little outta date. Wouldn't the cops start raking more money in if they suddenly changed to the 'door opening' radar bands while people set them to ignore... hehehehe hope noone gets any ideas.

    Hopefully this helps
    -Tristan

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •