Just read your article in the Herald today, and I've got a couple of questions.
You state that motorcyclists are 18 times more likely to be injured or killed than car drivers. But you say that for cars there are 8525 claims out of the approx 2,500,000, which works out at 0.341%, and for motorcyclists, 3173 claims out of the approx 130,000 motorcycles registered... or 2.44%
2.44/0.341 = 7.1 x more likely to have a claim related crash than car drivers. And that's if the stats provided by ACC are accurate). This doesn't take into account the cheaper cost of motorcycle claimants than car claimants.
If you want the other side of the story, you should contact Les Mason from BRONZ (
bronznational@gmail.com,
bronzauckland@hotmail.com) he's an excellent data analyst, and represents the bikers well. Obviously you could do your own cross checks to see that the data he provides adds up.
P.S. Just wondering if you can inform me of how much motorcyclists that are killed cost ACC? I don't know if they pay out compensation to the family or not. I wouldn't have thought so.
Bookmarks