Compulsory Injury Prevention Fund. Good or bad?

[Ixion]

Given the the majority of motorcycle accidents are cause not by themselves I suggest the ducation be broader than targetting motorcyclists and thereby include all drivers.

So, if we had an organisation who's primary function was injury prevention -- oh, wait whats that organisation that the Injury Prevention Rehabilitation and compensation Act created ?

The only reason Victoria did it as a separate levy was because they have private insurance who didn't want to know.

Injury prevention is what ACC is supposed to be about.

[Squiggles]

I imagine they burn most of their safety money in admin as it is, probably going to be no different. Why is our version of the prevention arm so useless? I await the commercials
e.g
[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mz8d7hUIPY[/YOUTUBE]

It should already exist, no it shouldnt be part of an increase unless its across the board on all vehicles.

[mashman]

Les, I have a question (quelle surprise): Will any new safety initiatives, risk mitigation, be taken into account when recalculating our ACC Levy?

[StoneY]

Again the thread has drifted, cant you people all just answer a simple question?

Is it a good idea?
Hell yes

Should it be part of our ACC
I believe yes

Does it justify the current proposed levys
HELL NO
and we all know why so cut the bullshit and just answer Les's question

[Headbanger]

and we all know why so cut the bullshit and just answer Les's question

Your a mod?

Nope.

Discussion is a good thing, It illustrates the feelings of the community far better then a one word answer.

Trying to ban discussion and the sharing of viewpoints=Bad.

Trying to ban discussion on a discussion board, in a thread that invites discussion=Silly