No leap of logic, nor twisting of words required. This thread was always about bashing the cops because one of them turned into the path of an oncoming motorcycle. It was never about bashing the cops for arriving late to a domestic dispute - we might save that for another slow news day
The suggestion was made that for some road policing a smaller vehicle maybe more appropriate, which was replied to with obfuscatory comments such as the one regarding officers being late to domestic disputes, and someone's sister dying. That was the original leap of logic right there.
Oh, there was also something about having enough room in the rear so that two officers couldassaultaccompany a prisoner cuffed in the back.
Keep on chooglin'
Full offence. Your argument is full of shit and you obviously know fuck all.
Telling people to join the police force - and you will give them a camry is like saying you enjoy wanking for the physical excercise. I don't know fuck all people who would join the cop shop if they had camry's.
Now down to the nitty gritty - camry's while they are good cars for taking the family to the supermarket.....handle like a boat in stormy weather. Anyone who has driven one or owns one will tell you this. The 2.4L donk is quick enough (unless you lucky to get a v6) - but the suspension is soft, and its front wheel drive. So turning circle is HUGE. Very comfy back seat - which is actually useless for a cop car.
As for your argument about Ford Mondeo being reliable - I would guess you have NEVER owned one. They are cheap sacks of shit. EVERY MONDEO OWNER WILL TELL YOU THEY ARE CRAP. Not to mention they have horrible 'transmission gremlins'. Focus is not much better. Go look at the resale value of these cars - there is a reason they are cheap.
No but seriously tell us how changing the cop cars are going to make them better drivers. Its attitudes like this that have fucked the planeless airforce, tankless army and battleshipless navy in NZ.....
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
As has been said before, many believe it is irrelevant how fast the bike was going, and also irrelevant why the cop was turning around. Looking at the bigger picture, this shit has to stop, cops should know better, and should be trained better etc, just look at the what coppie did thread, it isn't an isolated incident.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
The loop is in good condition at the moment. A particular lack of police through the Waikato region yesterday as well. Not that they were needed as everyone appeared to be happily pootling along.
Perhaps the tradition of removing your hat as a mark of respect? You don't wear a hat in church.
TOP QUOTE: The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other peoples money.
,br/> No. Because whatever the ute did is irrelevant.His Hawke must have been locked at that speed otherwise he could not give the perp a ticket. And thus an enquiry via the OIA should reveal the truth. Perhaps Ixion might like to pursue that course.
The whole issue is that the cop did a turn in a place patently unsafe. Whatever the ute did had zero effect on that. Tell me, what speed would the ute have had to be going at to make that turn safe?
The turn was unsafe if the ute was doing 10kph
The turn was unsafe if the ute was doing 100kph
The turn was unsafe if the ute was doing 154 kph
The turn was unsafe if the ute was doing 200kph.
The speed of the bike may argueably be relevant. But the focus on the ute is merely an example of the obfuscation and smokescreens with which the police obscure simple matters.
The cop had no business to try to do a turn there even if a uteful of monkeys flew past on the other side at 300 kph, strumming banjoes with their tails on fire.
The ute is irrelevant. Getting involved in arguments about it merely plays up to the police tactics of obscure confuse and find someone else to blame.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Nit-picking, perhaps, but the ute and its alleged speed did not cause the cop to turn. The cop DECIDED to turn, because he saw the speeding ute. The cop was, at all times, the deciding factor in what he did.
The ute and its speed was at most the catalyst only for what followed.
Well answered by Ixion #1164
Last edited by MSTRS; 26th April 2010 at 14:21.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks