
Originally Posted by
rastuscat
Go on, let us know what you want us to do. Like, instead of just sitting and grizzling about what we are doing, actually have a sensible idea and maybe we'll try it. So there.
The sad thing about this, is that police are demonstrating just how keen they are to reduce the road toll. But how few options are available to them to really do something about it. I'm sure no one, not even anyone in the police thinks for a moment that writing tickets for 105 km/hr is actually going to save any one this weekend. Police are just very short of effective things they can do, so they are hoping that by being seen to do "something" that the outcome will be better.
The focus on speed will always be part of the picture, as there is no doubt that reducing average speeds saves lives. A 25km/hr open road speed limit would be a very effective life saver.
One of the things I would like to see police do, is focus on following distances. IMHO data that shows nose-to-ail accidents does not tell the entire story of following too close.
Particularly on the open road, I notice following to close cases an entire subset of extra problems. Like vehicles can't pass one car without being forced into a seriously small gap. Vehicles turning right or left off the road cause panic for the driver three-back who didn't see them indicate. Vehicles take a chance at entering from a give way cutting in front of me, as a motorcyclist is the closest thing to a gap that they have seen for 10 minutes.
So how about worrying less about the chap who does 115 passing Nana, and having a good look at following distances.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Bookmarks