I fkin give up..
So this is what you meant by "The hard men"? Harley riders? They ride a Harley so they must be hard men?
Yknow what Les, that just about does it for me, book yourself into a clinic man, youre about done.
BRONZ can have my membership back and sorely missed I'm sure I'll be, not being a member of HOG and all.
You disrespectful SOB. Those guys who turned out today, who have turned out time and time again, politely or otherwise deserve better than BRONZ relying on "the hard men" pushing the cause.
Hard men, my arse!
Buying in to the "in the wind" branding does fck all for this fight. 125 or Rocket 111, all the same to me, but not it seems to you.
Fck it...
Done with BRONZ, until it gets it's head out of it's arse (or gets the arse off it's head).
I personally don't believe we can change this with motorcyclists protesting. We would need to be joined by many other groups. Unless the Govt sees that it will lose power or money. They won't give a shit. Doesn't matter how big the protest is or how many sigs on the petition. Unless it is going to cost those in power that power or money, they will do what they like. That is democracy for you. Possibly better than a dictatorship, possibly not. But it is the style of government we have.
Money talks.
Power talks.
Mr and Mrs Everyperson can talk.. but will be ignored.
Even the way the voting system is set up is set up to keep them in power. We have given up our ability to vote some one out for 'fairer representation'. I thought MMP would be better, I didn't realise how impossibly hard it is to vote someone out with MMP.
And as for Ixions comment about not falling off so often, wouldn't matter if there wasn't another single motorcycle accident again, that is not their agenda, in this case privatising acc is. And god knows what else after that. We have seen how they ignore stats that work against them and bend others to work for them.
However, I will still join peaceful protests, I will still make submissions, I will still vote against National. I believe I must try.
I will also still pay my registration. I have more to lose than $517.
Totally agree with ya there Wysper (bar the about small suggested Edit). The problem is ta get the idea across ta the masses. The loss of the Woodhouse Principle and the impending Privatisation of ACC is really what is at stack.
Ixon, don't judge all of Ulysses by the few that you know. The ones I ride with up in the Norf are quite a varied lot, and don't fit the mold ya trying ta label them all with (bit like bike riders as a whole).
New Zealand......
The Best Place in the World to live if ya Broke
"Whole life balance, Daniel-San" ("Karate Kid")
Kia kaha, kia toa, kia manawanui ( Be strong, be brave, be steadfast and sure)![]()
DON'T RIDE LIKE YA STOLE IT, RIDE TO SURVIVE.
I don't know if the 'hard men' ride Harleys. Certainly not all Harley riders would class as 'hard men'. Personally I am now fairly sure that the hard men don't actually exist.
Which is pretty much what the homonymic gentleman found earlier. But, we had to give them the opportunity to come forward if they were there. They didn't so we can ignore that approach in future.
But I do know that Harley riders form probably the biggest single group within motorcycling. They turned out in thousands for BIKEOI!. And haven't turned out again. If the ACC fight is one that involves motorcycling as a whole, then the opinions of the largest group in motorcycling can't be ignored. Even if those opinions are not those which you, or I, agree with.
Because, if we are to win, we must have the support of that group. And of many others, but Harleys are an easy one to identify. If we're not getting it (which we're not) then we (meaning me) need to find out why. That's not a matter of disrespecting those who have got the message and are supporting the cause. It's a matter of finding why a crucial part of our market isn't listening.
That 'finding out' is a bit tricky, because Harley riders are not majorily represented in BRONZ. Or here.But find out we must, and convince them that they should be fighting alongside us.
Which makes me start to think that the best approach may be education rather than protest. How can we show Harley riders (and scooter riders, another missing demographic) why they shouldn't be ignoring this.
(I'm probably including Harley type bikes as Harleys - the crusiers generally).
There are probably other big segments that aren't buying into the ACC fight. Harleys and scooters are two that I see. We need them aboard. Simple as that
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
I'm sure you are right about Ulysses. And, I do not know very many. Some (most ? all maybe) of those I do are very nice people. Their riding style doesn't work for me, but that's neither here nor there.
I do know (well, I think I do ) that Ulysses the organisation is very opposed to any resistance to ACC. They were from the beginning (again, that's the organisation, not the members), But, back at the beginning, a lot of Ulyssians turned out to fight, and ignored the Ulysses head office message . So I think that the organisational message wasn't in sync with the membership.
But now, I don't think I'm seeing them, in any numbers So I don't know if that's because they , like the Harley guys, don't think it's worth the effort; or because they've agreed with head office that the increase is , if not a good thing, then at least a justifiable one.
Once again, we need Ulyssians and Harley riders , and everyone else. We've tried peaceful, we've tried lobbying, we've tried protest rides. The ACC don't seem interested in taking any notice of any of it. And now we've made an honest effort to engage with the "not so peacful " people - who turn out, I suspect, not to exist. So, where to now ?
The only thing they (and Mr Smith) did take notice of was sheer numbers. 7000 bikes frightened them. So, how do we roll out 2000 bikes in Auckland (that being about the proportion I guess ?) . What will make the Harley riders, and the Ulyssians, and the scooter riders, turn out as they did for BIKEOI!.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Really? You have finally worked this out?
Maybe give them a bit more respect? Just a thought.
This Harley rider (i.e ME) is unimpressed with your reference to the type of people WE are just because of the brand of bike we happen to enjoy riding.......
Well we tried to get BIKEOI2 off the mark back in December. But it got no traction and withered away . (threads still on the forum, last post about 27th Dec I think) .I don't know if another attempt would fare any better, unless ACC come out with another rape attempt in October.
We have to be careful though, last time we turned up with 7000. If we only managed say 1000 this time, Mr Smith would claim that as a victory and a sign that we had lost support.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
over the summer holidays probably wasn't the best time for organising anything and so soon after the first one too. I reckon if you want big numbers again, another bikeoi is the way to go, no other action has even got 10% of the bikes we had there (iirc). And the way I see it if we don't turn up again at all, nick doesn't have to claim anything, its obvious he's won.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks