Yup, that's one of the providers I want to refer people to.
Check my other posts, I posted the three providers a few weeks back, coz I want folk to go do the training, regardless of why. Voluntarily is always good.
BTW, I rang the school quoted above yesterday, they've had quite a good uptake. Lots more people will do training voluntarily if it costs less. Funny old thing.
Right, need to promote it to my boss today, before the ACC funding runs out.
What you are advocating is choice, get a hefty ticket or go do training, show me the proof of doing the training and poof away goes the hefty fine.
This will work to a certain extend on some individuals i agree with you on that, but for others it will just be a cheaper option than the fine.
however, have Police as an institution advocating better mandatory training, on every given opportunity will in the end have more impact on the general public.
what you are doing/going to do will have some impact on some where you are, the rest of the countries inexperienced/bad/cocky riders will still have to deal with the law as it is.
I really would like the first responders, the police advocating minimum mandatory training. I believe it will have much more of an impact than hi viz, and a couple of cops saving one rider at a time.
mind, i don't know about silly sausages (never met one actually) but would still offer you pastry for afternoon tea
squeek squeek
I like the idea but have a question. How does it get implemented in an even handed manner. Does the recidivist offender simply attend umpteen training courses & never pay a fine or does Popo have to check the offenders record before making a decision.
Good idea , I see the potential for it to be abused by both sides, regretably I am a cynic when it comes to human nature.
FYI, I help organise free training for new riders in North Auckland, called NASS.
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/wiki/Nort..._Street_Skills
I got the permission of my local "Strategic Road Policing Manager" for the local motorcycle highway patrol officers to come along and help lend their advice during the training. I think they call it a "2P", part of their public relations functions. The don't come every time, but we sometimes get 1 or 2 officers along.
Anyway, the officers have told me that they have already referred several riders along (that being riders they feel are having basic skill issues) using their discretion along similar lines. In their case though, they are able to come along and see if the person attended ...
a fantastic idea, well worth supporting.
As Ive said before, I dont care about velocity tax, what pisses me off is the pointlessness of demerit points.
In other news, can you suggest alteration to suspension settings to improve an incipient headshake/twitchiness in certain models of Triumph motorcycle at speeds of 180kph + ? Do they cover that in the ACC course? I'm thinking tyre pressures and or suspension settings, but maybe a steering damper though I dont really like that band-aid type of fix
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
the big issues will be around implementation: who are the trainers, where are they based, how long do the punters get to get the training and is it achievable in terms of timeframe? Are there trainers available in Gore, Westport, Balclutha, Queenstown, Huntly or Waihi?
Nothing that couldnt be worked thru though.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Excellent idea.
Haven't had the privelige of being stopped over here (yet) but warnings by a couple of UK bike cops in my youth provided timely necessary reality checks and initiated me going on a UK Bike cop course. It consisted of "making progress" during a series of night time rides through fast country roads and villages. Best thing I ever did and saved me numerous times daily when DRing in London. The warnings of being stupid were far more effective than a ticket, especially the way they were said and from another motorcyclist.
I think it is a great idea.
Would you not potentially fall fowl of 'coercement' though ?
E.g. When someone is caught polluting a stream or whatever, we used to write to the offender, asking for our clean up costs to be paid, and implying that if they don't, they will receive a fine. Our legal counsel advised that we could not do that.
But as I said, I think it is a great idea.
Visit the team here - teambentley
Thanks to my sponsors : The Station Sports Cafe and Bar | TSS Red Baron | Zany Zeus | Continental | The Office Relocation Company | Fine Signs | Stokes Valley Collision Repair | CBWD Digital Media Inbound Marketing
Great idea. But it should be the whole country. The law and it's application isn't regionalised, is it?
It appears to me to be a form of diversion, which is only offered to first time offenders?
Do you treat any fineable offence in isolation, or decide to not offer because rider X has had a speeding ticket (say) within the last 10 years (say) ?
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
My take on it is a little different from diversion.
If I can get anyone to attend training, their riding will probably improve. I actually don't care if they have had 3 previous tickets, or even 19. Getting them to training is what counts. Even the cynical will learn something, even if they think they already know it all.
The training will be run by three of the local professional riding instructors, through their schools. I'm not a trainer, it needs to be delivered by someone who does it for a job, and that's not me.
Thanks for all the comments to date. I'll keep checking my in-tray to see when the donuts arrive. Not yet![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks