Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 42

Thread: Stainless steel brakelines

  1. #16
    OE stainless lines are ok...but unless you are very well versed in that model you'll never know,even bike shop mechanics can get that wrong if they work in a Suzuki shop and have never come across some obscure Honda model.But it's up to you the owner to prove they are standard issue or comply.....well,you can pay the inspector at an hourly rate to find out for you,but it's not really his job,the WoF is just a visual inspection.This rule has come about because in the good old days all brake components were made in a professional shop,but these days you can make your own or import them yourself from who knows where - that's why a standard had to be set.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  2. #17
    Join Date
    1st March 2005 - 14:45
    Bike
    Assorted dinosaurs
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    718
    Blog Entries
    27
    So guys, the guts of this mass debate is that, in short: braided lines NEED THE CORRECT NUMBERS/LETTERS ID ON THEM TO GET A WOF
    In that case what are the numbers/letters?
    ITS NOT GETTING WHAT YOU WANT,BUT WANTING WHAT YOUVE GOT
    https://hondacx500custombuild.blogspot.com/?m=1

  3. #18
    Join Date
    24th June 2004 - 17:27
    Bike
    So old you won't care
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    7,884
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodave
    So guys, the guts of this mass debate is that, in short: braided lines NEED THE CORRECT NUMBERS/LETTERS ID ON THEM TO GET A WOF
    In that case what are the numbers/letters?
    I'm just going through this now Dave... My lines have the right numbers but apparently the connectors are not the right type except i can't find anything IN the fecking reg's about connectors (other than damaged ones being uncool)

    Watch this space or the 2 other threads on this...

    Personally... I'm about to fecking give up on old bikes... It's just getting harder every year to keep them on the road. This shit pisses me off as I'm utterly anal about my bikes and they are usually in better condition that when they left the factory (mech speaking).... I'm sick of the disapproving looks and the eyes rolling up in the head everywhere from bike shops, cops, etc etc.. Funnily enough, people usually love to see them on the road...

    I dunno...

  4. #19
    Join Date
    8th July 2005 - 12:33
    Bike
    1997 Suzuki TL1000 S, 1999 Ducati 996S ?
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodave
    So guys, the guts of this mass debate is that, in short: braided lines NEED THE CORRECT NUMBERS/LETTERS ID ON THEM TO GET A WOF
    In that case what are the numbers/letters?
    No idea. I just went into TSS, said 'can I had stainless steel braided hoses for a TL 1000 S, here's the lengths I need". They rang their suppliers, who picked the hoses of the nearest lengths out of the parts bins & sent them down. Passed the WOF. The numbers on them are not bike specific but at a guess, the standard to which they have been built. The cynical side of me does question how closely the WOF person is going to look at the writing, but saying that, the writing on these particular lines is obviously machine generated and is repeated continously down the length of the hose. The upshot is that that these are not lines that have been made in somebody's shed that have had the appropriate numbers crayoned down the side.

    My advice would be to go to a reputable bike dealer & get your hoses through them. It will cost a bit, but at least you'll have peace of mind that the hoses will be of the correct standard. Or if they aren't, it's the bike shops problem, not yours.

  5. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodave
    In that case what are the numbers/letters?
    iii - can be identified as complying with a recognised approved automotive standard (such as FMVSS-106)

    That's all the information the VIRM supplies,there are probably dozens of approved standards,but LTNZ supplies one,so unless your testing authority has a secret list they are only guessing....but anything with SAE on it will be taken as gospel.

    Paul - what exactly is wrong with your fittings? If the hoses comply how could the fittings not comply? Your inspector is going outside his brief - is this the same guy who invented some bullshit about your footpegs? As much as you think he's a great guy,don't let him do a WoF on your bike! Much as the Cop who got told off for inventing a law about tinted visors - a WoF inspector can't invent regulations that don't exist.We are told by LTNZ that the VIRM is our Bible - if there is wording in there for a fail,then it fails,if there is no wording suitable to hang a fail on then it passes - get him to show you WHERE in the VIRM he finds your hoses fail.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  6. #21
    Join Date
    24th October 2005 - 18:52
    Bike
    1979 Kawasaki Z1300
    Location
    Torbay, Auckland
    Posts
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
    So nothing about the connectors - just the line?
    Nope, for stainless hoses it makes no mention of connections (crimped or screwed), just that the complete hose needs to be up to standard.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    10th October 2005 - 15:27
    Bike
    Buell M2 Cyclone
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    211
    You could ring gss performance in auckland on 09 525 6858. They have street legal brake lines made up that carry the j1401 code, apparently this is what you need for street use.

    They are factory crimped and available in various lengths.



    The suck thing about all this is that i sold the teflon line and reusable fittings to brakespecs in the past, they could use them and say they were legal for road however we couldnt make them and sell them ourselves.

    All we got told from our supplier was that they werent prepared to go through the process of spending the time and money to get around this problem. I however have made lots for race and off road vehicles.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    24th June 2004 - 17:27
    Bike
    So old you won't care
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    7,884
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu

    iii - can be identified as complying with a recognised approved automotive standard (such as FMVSS-106)

    That's all the information the VIRM supplies,there are probably dozens of approved standards,but LTNZ supplies one,so unless your testing authority has a secret list they are only guessing....but anything with SAE on it will be taken as gospel.

    Paul - what exactly is wrong with your fittings? If the hoses comply how could the fittings not comply? Your inspector is going outside his brief - is this the same guy who invented some bullshit about your footpegs? As much as you think he's a great guy,don't let him do a WoF on your bike! Much as the Cop who got told off for inventing a law about tinted visors - a WoF inspector can't invent regulations that don't exist.We are told by LTNZ that the VIRM is our Bible - if there is wording in there for a fail,then it fails,if there is no wording suitable to hang a fail on then it passes - get him to show you WHERE in the VIRM he finds your hoses fail.
    This is what I'm thinking...

    I talked to him about it.. he was pretty definate so I'm guessing he has been told something that I can't confirm in the regs... Pretty fecking annoying!

    I'm going to go see him this arvo and ask to see the regs because I too think this is bollocks. I'll see if I can find a soft copy of the regs first.

    Paul N

  9. #24
    It works both ways - you have to prove that whatever is on your bike complies....Hehas to prove to you where in the regulations you fail,if he has something to back it up,is it officail,or something he got from the Vincent Owners Club and is now applying it to your bike.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  10. #25
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
    This is what I'm thinking...

    I talked to him about it.. he was pretty definate so I'm guessing he has been told something that I can't confirm in the regs... Pretty fecking annoying!

    I'm going to go see him this arvo and ask to see the regs because I too think this is bollocks. I'll see if I can find a soft copy of the regs first.

    Paul N
    Here is the VIR manual
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  11. #26
    Join Date
    24th October 2005 - 18:52
    Bike
    1979 Kawasaki Z1300
    Location
    Torbay, Auckland
    Posts
    375
    Trade Parts
    Brake & Clutch Specialists
    151 Wairau Rd Glenfield Auckland
    0-9-444 0901

    They made mine up, I took the old hoses in to use as a pattern and they made up the stainless ones, with correct markings and crimped ends, due to higher handlebars being fitted on the project I had the Master cylinder to bottom tree hose made longer, just gave them the measurement and it fits perfectly even got the correct angles on the ends.

    I know it was a trade price but $120 for a set of 4 "legal" stainless hoses was pretty good.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    9th January 2005 - 22:12
    Bike
    Street Triple R
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    8,415
    How did you guys KNOW I was investigating this very topic this morning. The CB400F front brake will just about stop you if you give it a HEARTY squeeze, so I am going to look for softer pads, change out the fluid, and get a new line made to replace one that is 27 years old....

    Just spoke to DOn at Cycletreads and specifically asked him the question and he assured me no problem, the ones he has have the appropriate bits and bobs. Reasonably priced, too it seems like.

    excellent!

    thanks for the referral to the previous discussion.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    15th August 2005 - 22:07
    Bike
    78xs12
    Location
    pn
    Posts
    89
    My old 78 XS has steel lines made by ENZED before all these bullshit regulations came in. Took the old dunger in for a warrant and the gits at PitStop started pissing their pants over the lines.
    Them. "They're crimped not screwed, they're illegal - it's a new rule"
    Me. "Who the fuck brought that bullshit in?"
    Them. "Someone in a car with steel lines crashed, so the officials in Wellington brought it in"
    Me. "So what do I do about it?"
    Them. "Take them to Wellington and get the chief inspector to inspect them"
    "If he thinks they're O.K. he'll certify them" "It costs about $300"
    Me. "Fuck that"
    Them. "Then go and buy some new certified lines"
    Me. "Fuck that"
    Them. "We won't issue a warrant until they're changed"
    Me. "I'll go home and put back on my spongy 25 year old rubber hoses then come back"
    Them. "O.K"

    Did just that. Got the warrant. The fact the brakes were 50% less effective meant fuck all. Went back home and put the steels back on again. What a fucking hassle. Never went back to PitStop ever again. Found a garage who aren't hand wringing wimpering prats. Get a warrant every time. Slid on some red spark lead rubber with numbers and letters to look official.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    24th June 2004 - 17:27
    Bike
    So old you won't care
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    7,884
    Well my experience to date is...

    There is nothing in the regulations that I can find that says anything about the connectors. The line however has to have some sort of tested standard.

    But....

    A clever company has got LTNZ to approve their lines which are swaged and has little plastic doofers etc on em. They have sent this approval certificate and some mumbo jumbo to every wof tester telling that their factory made ones are 'pressure tested' (oh please) and the assemble your self sort can't be and are therefore unsafe.

    This letter looks official but to my eyes it is NOT. It looks like they photocopied a reduced certificate next to their words and imply the other sort are unsafe... This is clever but not very nice....

    I will try to contact LTNZ about this asap (but kinda busy at the moment)

    So.. Since I already had a line (purchased at great expense) from a decent bloke.. I have come to an accomodation that will see me part with no more money, obtain a flash new line and eventually a wof... All because the man in question is a gentleman, I will not be dragging him into it. I believe that he is doing his best.

    Paul in NZ

    ps - I note with wry amusement and not a little concern that the rocker oil feed that failed in spectacular fashion on the way to the Raglan Guzzi rally a couple of years back was... yes, a swaged line made by Pirtek and pressure tested... Had it been fitted to my brakes I would have passed my wof. Good luck guys, we are going to need it...

  15. #30
    Join Date
    15th August 2005 - 22:07
    Bike
    78xs12
    Location
    pn
    Posts
    89
    Crimped rubber lines are O.K. But crimped steel lines are no good. Some snaking money-grubbing non-motorcycling office-wallah in Wellington says so. What a total crock of shit. The prats don't even know steel lines ARE rubber lines. With an outer steel sheath to stop expansion. But they know best.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •