Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41

Thread: Idea

  1. #16
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    A mate assures me that at 200kmh+ the cameras wont get you. Recons it is to do with the timing and the exposure etc. But I have not been game to verify this though.
    Knowing the guy, I am sure he has.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    21st November 2004 - 23:26
    Bike
    various
    Location
    South
    Posts
    317
    If enough people got them they would mod the cameras to flash you a couple of "redeye reduction flashes" to dejuice your counterflash and then snap you.
    Insert witticism.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    4th November 2003 - 00:41
    Bike
    Yamama R6 & Frankie the Bucket
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,955
    It would work and it would be a piece of cake...I considered doing it many years ago but never got around to it.

    First the theory...when it's dark and a camera takes a photo using the flash, the exposure is controlled by the length of the flash, not the shutter speed. Obviously there are limits to this but I can't be bothered going into this in too much detail.
    Higher end modern cameras will actually measure the amount of flash reflecting off the film that it's exposing and actually turn the flash off once it's received enough light (ATTL), this is where the problem could come from. To get around it you would need to dump a heap of extra light onto the film to make sure the camera could not adjust in time.

    So anyway, either buy or build a slave unit. This is a thing that is designed to trigger a flash when it senses another flash so that you can have more than one flash but no messy cords. Hook em up to 3 or 4 disposable camera flash units, then position them on the bike.

    I'll leave the testing to you, let me know if you get a ticket!
    The Unknown Rider

  4. #19
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    Pin g Big Dave or someone seriously into photography.

    I'm sure there's a "flash relay" or something like that (Google didn't help on this one) but I know the photographers use something similar to light up huge objects if they need to trigger multiple flashes all at once for a REALLY big photo.

    They detect the flash of light from another flash, and that triggers their own flash to go off...

    Sounds like it might do the job?
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  5. #20
    Join Date
    22nd April 2004 - 15:31
    Bike
    GSX-R600K3
    Location
    lower hutt
    Posts
    852
    Here we are http://www.buyradardetectors.com/pro...lizer-vf2.aspx

    Tired of receiving tickets in the mail? The VF2 Photo Jammer actively blocks any system that uses a flash camera to photograph your license plate! This includes speed cameras, red light cameras -- even toll booth cameras.

    The VF2 looks like a regular license plate light, and mounts directly above your license plate. It works by using a sophisticated sensor to detect a camera flash or an infrared signal. When either of these are detected, a powerful burst of white light is instantly released downward across the license plate. When the enforcement camera takes the picture, all it will see is the bright light -- the license plate numbers will not be visible!

    This technology works against all analog photo traps, all infrared photo traps, and against all digital photo traps in use today.

    The VF-2 was recently tested by Speed Measurement Labs (SML) in El Paso, Texas and was found to perform very well. In the SML tests, the VF2 defeated each and every photo attempt in the test!
    Life is difficult because it is non-linear.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    10th February 2005 - 21:49
    Bike
    06 10 WITH ALL THE FANCY BITS
    Location
    ON THE APEX/BETWEEN CARS
    Posts
    1,765
    That last link sounds like a good idea. Another one would be to put an LCD panel covering the plate that is black when triggered - see through with normal operation and appears to be a normal plate, when any flash/light change is done it triggers for .3secs or so, that even police driving behind wouldn't realise. Not that you would be speeding in that case anyway

    edit: that also foxes the whole preflash thing in the future.

    Damn I'm good.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    21st July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    92 Yamaha FJ1430A
    Location
    Nana Republic
    Posts
    2,543
    Blog Entries
    23
    Life is tough. It's tougher when you're stupid

    SARGE
    represented by GCM

  8. #23
    Join Date
    29th October 2005 - 09:52
    Bike
    2001 Suzuki FXR150
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    24
    haha, dunno about the theory, but I love the name.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    7th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Aquired by locals
    Location
    Groote Eylandt
    Posts
    6,606
    Johnny English: Use you rockets to destroy the offending toll booth.
    To every man upon this earth
    Death cometh sooner or late
    And how can a man die better
    Than facing fearful odds
    For the ashes of his fathers
    And the temples of his Gods

  10. #25
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    GATSO speed cameras will work sucessfully uo to 275 km/h (as tested by Top Gear)
    A diffuser lens on a flash unit should give the beam spread needed to blind cameras at an angle to your vehicle.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    1st July 2004 - 11:19
    Bike
    El Bandito Negro
    Location
    a medicated stupor
    Posts
    1,334
    Quote Originally Posted by CaN
    Ok you are driving at night, barely exceeding the speed limit and BANG out of the blue you are flashed by one of those photographic toll booths.

    But you don't worry because you have the CaN Photo Phucker (tm) fitted to your vehicle.
    They're known by many names including slave flashes, light triggered flashes etc.

    I've got a couple in my hand, from memory they cost about $40 each.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    1st December 2004 - 12:27
    Bike
    06 Transalp
    Location
    Levin
    Posts
    1,418
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion
    But is there not a theory that speed cameras don't get bikes (can't front on, no plate, but many claim they don't get rear on either). Has anyone ever actually had a ticket from a speed camera (not a cop-stop, but one in the mail)
    Yup, had 2 of them...
    Not had to pay either though! (was being tailgated in one and the wind was strong and gusty in the other)
    Motorbike only search
    YOU ONLY NEED TWO TOOLS IN LIFE - CRC AND DUCT TAPE. IF IT DOESN'T MOVE AND SHOULD, USE THE CRC. IF IT SHOULDN'T MOVE AND DOES, USE THE DUCT TAPE

  13. #28
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Erm - so light directed at your bike, at the speed of light, is detected, then another light, travelling at the speed of light, is flashed back? Hmmm - I can't see it working. Even taking into account any latency in the electromatronic circustree. Love to be proven wrong though.
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

  14. #29
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    Two triples
    Location
    Bugtussle
    Posts
    2,982
    Quote Originally Posted by Biff
    Erm - so light directed at your bike, at the speed of light, is detected, then another light, travelling at the speed of light, is flashed back? Hmmm - I can't see it working. Even taking into account any latency in the electromatronic circustree. Love to be proven wrong though.
    Why not?
    Considering the stuff travels at 0.3 Gm/sec

  15. #30
    Join Date
    8th December 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Super Adventure 1290s, Bonnie T214
    Location
    Christchurchish
    Posts
    2,284
    Quote Originally Posted by Pixie
    Why not?
    Considering the stuff travels at 0.3 Gm/sec
    So - photon particles travelling at 186,000 miles per second (Kmps) leave the camera, they then hit the detector circuit on the bike, the detector circuit then does it's stuff, recognising the particles, processes the information (depending on the design) then sends an instruction to a light source of some description on the bike, activating it, which is then fired back at the camera at 186Kmps.

    In this time the initial light source from the camera would have hit the bike and have been relected back to the camera. Would it not? I can't see the detector circuit detecting the light particles, switching on a light source (not a filament bulb - they take far too long to switch on) and then for that light radiating from the bike reaching the camera, in effect temporarily blinding it, before the camera has recorded the initial reflection. And if the bike is moving you also have to consider doppler shift.
    This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:

    Thavalayolee
    You Frog Fucker

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •