Good idea in principal. It would fall down in the details. Only realistic scenario is to bump the max. speed for bikes only![]()
Good idea in principal. It would fall down in the details. Only realistic scenario is to bump the max. speed for bikes only![]()
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
I rode quite a bit in germany and the autobahns work great. Motorcycle accidents were few but usually fatal. Wish we had roads like that here but with our crap tarmac and corners it would be impossible.
Exert your talents, and distinguish yourself, and don't think of retiring from the world, until the world will be sorry that you retire. -Samuel Johnson
15 -25 year old male would be valid.Originally Posted by sAsLEX
I think you could list the criteria :
- Poor visibility (or night)
- Heavy traffic
- Wet/poor road surface
- Driver under 25
- Driver breaching licence conditions
- Vehicle defective/no WoF
- Travelling faster than traffic flow
- Learner/restricted licence holder
- Other high risk road users (eg children,animals) present
- Driver has history of offences.
That's 10. So you could make a simple matrix. Takes any "personal" element out of it. Less than 2 hazards present, very unliely to get a ticket. More than 5 present , very likely.
Good clear road, no other traffic, experienced driver good car - no probs.
Pissing with rain, 11pm at night, heavy traffic doing 50kph, and you're dodging in and out of it, in your beat up old Mazda 323 , with your mates, on your restricted , you're 17 years old: and you get a ticket for inappropriate speed for doing 81kph on the open road. Jolly good too.
And, the converse of course as a defence against a ticket for over 120kph. Experienced driver, advanced licence, good car/bike no other traffic, good road and visibility; good defence.
Easy to do. Just reckon up the hazard factors, and make your judgement. Cop can do the same.
Reason I like this approach is it gets away form the "magic number" - where under 100kph you are always "safe", over 100kph is always "dangerous". Makes people (and cops) consider the real safety or danger of a given speed.
EDIT: If you get a ticket the cop has to list on it the hazard factors that he reckons warrant the ticket.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Prima facie 100 k limit - a bit like the LSZ, only faster. They used to have a PF 60mph limit in NSW, way back in the old days - it always seemed more sensible to me. Speed limit a nominal limit but, dependant on circumstances, etc,etc......speeds in excess of the limit deemed acceptable.
Looks like it comes back to that thing - "discretion".......that which is not in a lot of evidence of late.........![]()
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
For a system like this to be fair, any charge would need to be a percentage of your income!
I've got one.
It cost me $500 from the Confederation of Northern Tribes.
NZ's true Government.
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
Did you get a complimentary dog fight ticket with that?
Didn't the cheifs later sign the treaty of waitangi, thereby voiding the former confederation?Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
Anyway, 140kpH licence, accredited driving course, medical, clean licence, over 25, bike / car "wof" every 3 months, different plates for easy ident on the road by enforcement, open road, good conditions only.... blah blah
whats the chances?
You need to be careful around that area, I use to live down Mt Cook and found that while there aren't that many cops (well there are a enough, but it's a huge area to cover), the local coppers are very good at catching you out, even when you know the area quite well![]()
It's a good idea, in Theory
Communism is a good idea, in Theory
Communism is a good idea. Done. Welcome, comrade.Originally Posted by alarumba
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Just so long as your idea (and those who currently design / implement maintenance changes), doesn't include removing every last corner, chicane sudden rise/drops etc that make current roads fun.Originally Posted by Lord Derosso
I would hate to think how many nice "bike roads" in NZ have been wrecked by roading gangs straightening them out just so incompetant cage drivers can get from A to B without coming to grief.
Sure those "narly bits" can be a bit hair raising for grannys and someone whose half asleep but at the end of the day, those things make riding on 2 wheels bloody great fun.
If someone ever decides to put a tunnel through the hill to Akaroa - I'll make a point of hunting him/her down personally...![]()
The tread goes around that far for a reason...
Originally Posted by Kickaha
Too true - see my earlier post on that subject on this thread.![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Got one of those licences - and get paid to do it!!Originally Posted by ghost
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks